Piyush Bawane, Mayank Jain, M. Srinivas, T. Michael, J. Venkataraman
{"title":"Factors Predicting Peristaltic Abnormalities in Gastroesophageal Reflux","authors":"Piyush Bawane, Mayank Jain, M. Srinivas, T. Michael, J. Venkataraman","doi":"10.7869/TG.556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Data regarding the type of breaks and its impact on peristalsis in gastro esophageal reflux disease(GERD) is scanty. Aim : To study the prevalence and significance of segmental breaks in symptomatic GERD cases. To identify the endoscopy grading and dietary factors that are likely to affect esophageal motility. Materials and Methods : 106 patients with GERD were included. Baseline patient information included age, gender, BMI, diet recall and upper endoscopy report.Normal (Group I) and ineffective swallows (Group II, minor peristaltic defects) were compared for proximal and distal segment breaks . Impact of multiple rapid swallows was assessed in a subset of cases.Appropriate statistical tests were used. p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : 72 patients had normal esophageal motility (Group I) and 30 had minor peristalitc abnormality (Group II). BMI was significantly higher in Group II. Mean basal LES pressure, IRP and DCI in Group II was significantly low and a significant proportion of swallows in patients in Group II had breaks greater than 5 cm in S1 and more than 2 cm in S2 and S3. The basal LES pressure and BMI cut off was 12.1 mm Hg and 26.1 kg per m2respectively. The odds ratio of having a minor peristaltic disorder was 3.2 times(1.4-4.1, p 0.001) with the combination of these two factors. Conclusion : Majority of GERD patients had normal motility. Even in those with minor peristaltic abnormality, the peristaltic reserve was good.Patients in group II had significantly lower basal LES pressures and higher BMI.","PeriodicalId":23281,"journal":{"name":"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation","volume":"3 1","pages":"151-155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7869/TG.556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background : Data regarding the type of breaks and its impact on peristalsis in gastro esophageal reflux disease(GERD) is scanty. Aim : To study the prevalence and significance of segmental breaks in symptomatic GERD cases. To identify the endoscopy grading and dietary factors that are likely to affect esophageal motility. Materials and Methods : 106 patients with GERD were included. Baseline patient information included age, gender, BMI, diet recall and upper endoscopy report.Normal (Group I) and ineffective swallows (Group II, minor peristaltic defects) were compared for proximal and distal segment breaks . Impact of multiple rapid swallows was assessed in a subset of cases.Appropriate statistical tests were used. p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : 72 patients had normal esophageal motility (Group I) and 30 had minor peristalitc abnormality (Group II). BMI was significantly higher in Group II. Mean basal LES pressure, IRP and DCI in Group II was significantly low and a significant proportion of swallows in patients in Group II had breaks greater than 5 cm in S1 and more than 2 cm in S2 and S3. The basal LES pressure and BMI cut off was 12.1 mm Hg and 26.1 kg per m2respectively. The odds ratio of having a minor peristaltic disorder was 3.2 times(1.4-4.1, p 0.001) with the combination of these two factors. Conclusion : Majority of GERD patients had normal motility. Even in those with minor peristaltic abnormality, the peristaltic reserve was good.Patients in group II had significantly lower basal LES pressures and higher BMI.
背景:关于胃食管反流病(GERD)的断裂类型及其对蠕动的影响的资料很少。目的:探讨有症状的反流胃食管反流中节段断裂的发生率及意义。确定可能影响食管运动的内镜分级和饮食因素。材料与方法:纳入106例胃食管反流患者。基线患者信息包括年龄、性别、BMI、饮食回忆和上颌内窥镜检查报告。比较正常燕子(组I)和无效燕子(组II,轻微蠕动缺陷)近端和远端节段断裂情况。在部分病例中评估了多次快速吞咽的影响。采用了适当的统计检验。P值<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:食管运动正常72例(I组),轻度蠕动异常30例(II组),II组BMI明显增高。II组患者的平均基础LES压、IRP和DCI均明显较低,且II组患者中有显著比例的吞口S1大于5cm, S2和S3大于2cm。基础LES压和BMI分别为12.1 mm Hg和26.1 kg / m2。合并这两个因素时,患有轻微蠕动障碍的比值比为3.2倍(1.4-4.1,p 0.001)。结论:大多数胃食管反流患者运动功能正常。即使有轻微的蠕动异常,蠕动储备也很好。II组患者基底LES压明显降低,BMI明显升高。