Commentary on Assessment of Burr-Hole Craniostomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Unblinded Comparative Trial of Burr-HoleCraniostomies and Drainage with or without Irrigation for Newly Progressed Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Sayaka Ito, Haruka Miyata, Tomoaki Fujita, Y. Nonoyama, T. Nakazawa, ShigeharuFukao
{"title":"Commentary on Assessment of Burr-Hole Craniostomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Randomized Unblinded Comparative Trial of Burr-HoleCraniostomies and Drainage with or without Irrigation for Newly Progressed Chronic Subdural Hematoma","authors":"Sayaka Ito, Haruka Miyata, Tomoaki Fujita, Y. Nonoyama, T. Nakazawa, ShigeharuFukao","doi":"10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common clinical entities in neurosurgical practice. Although the therapeutic management is well established with burr-hole craniostomy and drainage, patients with CSDH still suffer from recurrence up to 33% [1-3]. Recently reported randomized controlled studies revealed that drainage is the most effective treatment in controlling recurrence [4,5]. As far as we know, there is no reported trials revealing whether simple drainage without irrigation (simple drainage) or with irrigation (irrigation drainage) could treat CSDH with less recurrence rate compared to the other. The purpose of this study is toanalyze thepostoperative recurrence rate and complications between drainage with and without irrigation. The present trial is permitted by Institutional Review Board of Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital (No. 2020-18).","PeriodicalId":15375,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical trials","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0870.20.10.422","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common clinical entities in neurosurgical practice. Although the therapeutic management is well established with burr-hole craniostomy and drainage, patients with CSDH still suffer from recurrence up to 33% [1-3]. Recently reported randomized controlled studies revealed that drainage is the most effective treatment in controlling recurrence [4,5]. As far as we know, there is no reported trials revealing whether simple drainage without irrigation (simple drainage) or with irrigation (irrigation drainage) could treat CSDH with less recurrence rate compared to the other. The purpose of this study is toanalyze thepostoperative recurrence rate and complications between drainage with and without irrigation. The present trial is permitted by Institutional Review Board of Kyoto Okamoto Memorial Hospital (No. 2020-18).
慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔开颅术评价:一项随机非盲对照试验:新进展的慢性硬膜下血肿的钻孔开颅术与有或无冲洗引流
慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)是神经外科最常见的临床疾病之一。虽然采用钻孔开颅引流的治疗方法较为完善,但CSDH患者的复发率仍高达33%[1-3]。最近报道的随机对照研究表明,引流是控制复发最有效的治疗方法[4,5]。据我们所知,目前还没有文献报道单纯引流不灌水(simple drainage)或灌水(irrigation drainage)治疗CSDH的复发率比单纯引流低。本研究的目的是分析有冲洗和无冲洗引流的术后复发率和并发症。本试验经京都冈本纪念医院机构审查委员会(No. 2020-18)批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信