Different Faces of False

M. Babcock, David M. Beskow, Kathleen M. Carley
{"title":"Different Faces of False","authors":"M. Babcock, David M. Beskow, Kathleen M. Carley","doi":"10.1145/3339468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The task of combating false information online appears daunting, in part due to a public focus on how quickly it can spread and the clamor for automated platform-based interventions. While such concerns can be warranted, threat analysis and intervention design both benefit from a fuller understanding of different types of false information and of the community responses to them. Here, we present a study of the most tweeted about movie ever (Black Panther) in which the spread of false information of four different types is compared to the ad hoc Twitter community response. We find that (1) false information tweets played a small part in the overall conversation, (2) community-based debunking and shaming responses to false posts about attacks at theaters overwhelmed such posts by orders of magnitude, (3) as another form of community response, one type of false narrative (Satire) was used to attack another (Fake Attacks), and (4) the four types of false-information tweets differed in the use of hashtags and in the role played by originating users and responding users. Overall, this work helps to illustrate the importance of investigating “on-the-ground” community responses to fake news and other types of digital false information and to inform identification and intervention design and implementation.","PeriodicalId":15582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","volume":"1 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3339468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The task of combating false information online appears daunting, in part due to a public focus on how quickly it can spread and the clamor for automated platform-based interventions. While such concerns can be warranted, threat analysis and intervention design both benefit from a fuller understanding of different types of false information and of the community responses to them. Here, we present a study of the most tweeted about movie ever (Black Panther) in which the spread of false information of four different types is compared to the ad hoc Twitter community response. We find that (1) false information tweets played a small part in the overall conversation, (2) community-based debunking and shaming responses to false posts about attacks at theaters overwhelmed such posts by orders of magnitude, (3) as another form of community response, one type of false narrative (Satire) was used to attack another (Fake Attacks), and (4) the four types of false-information tweets differed in the use of hashtags and in the role played by originating users and responding users. Overall, this work helps to illustrate the importance of investigating “on-the-ground” community responses to fake news and other types of digital false information and to inform identification and intervention design and implementation.
虚假的不同面目
打击网上虚假信息的任务似乎令人生畏,部分原因是公众关注虚假信息传播的速度,以及要求基于平台的自动干预的呼声。虽然这种担忧是有道理的,但对不同类型的虚假信息和社区对这些信息的反应的更充分理解,对威胁分析和干预设计都有好处。在这里,我们提出了一项关于电影(黑豹)的推特最多的研究,其中四种不同类型的虚假信息的传播与临时Twitter社区的反应进行了比较。我们发现:(1)虚假信息推文在整体对话中只占很小的一部分,(2)基于社区的对有关影院袭击的虚假帖子的揭穿和羞辱回应以数量级压倒了这些帖子,(3)作为另一种形式的社区回应,一种类型的虚假叙述(讽刺)被用来攻击另一种类型的虚假叙述(假攻击),(4)四种类型的假信息推文在使用标签以及发起用户和响应用户所扮演的角色上存在差异。总体而言,这项工作有助于说明调查“实地”社区对假新闻和其他类型数字虚假信息的反应的重要性,并为识别和干预设计和实施提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信