Raft Refloated: Do We Have Consensus?

H. Howard, Malte Schwarzkopf, Anil Madhavapeddy, J. Crowcroft
{"title":"Raft Refloated: Do We Have Consensus?","authors":"H. Howard, Malte Schwarzkopf, Anil Madhavapeddy, J. Crowcroft","doi":"10.1145/2723872.2723876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Paxos algorithm is famously difficult to reason about and even more so to implement, despite having been synonymous with distributed consensus for over a decade. The recently proposed Raft protocol lays claim to being a new, understandable consensus algorithm, improving on Paxos without making compromises in performance or correctness.\n In this study, we repeat the Raft authors' performance analysis. We developed a clean-slate implementation of the Raft protocol and built an event-driven simulation framework for prototyping it on experimental topologies. We propose several optimizations to the Raft protocol and demonstrate their effectiveness under contention. Finally, we empirically validate the correctness of the Raft protocol invariants and evaluate Raft's understandability claims.","PeriodicalId":7046,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"71","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2723872.2723876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 71

Abstract

The Paxos algorithm is famously difficult to reason about and even more so to implement, despite having been synonymous with distributed consensus for over a decade. The recently proposed Raft protocol lays claim to being a new, understandable consensus algorithm, improving on Paxos without making compromises in performance or correctness. In this study, we repeat the Raft authors' performance analysis. We developed a clean-slate implementation of the Raft protocol and built an event-driven simulation framework for prototyping it on experimental topologies. We propose several optimizations to the Raft protocol and demonstrate their effectiveness under contention. Finally, we empirically validate the correctness of the Raft protocol invariants and evaluate Raft's understandability claims.
筏子重新浮起:我们有共识吗?
Paxos算法是出了名的难以推理,更难以实现,尽管十多年来它一直是分布式共识的代名词。最近提出的Raft协议声称是一种新的,可理解的共识算法,在Paxos的基础上进行改进,而不会在性能或正确性上做出妥协。在本研究中,我们重复了Raft作者的性能分析。我们开发了Raft协议的全新实现,并构建了一个事件驱动的仿真框架,用于在实验拓扑上对其进行原型设计。我们对Raft协议提出了几种优化方案,并在竞争中证明了它们的有效性。最后,我们通过经验验证了Raft协议不变量的正确性,并评估了Raft的可理解性声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信