Effect of Different Foam Rolling Sensitivities on the Amount of Change in Range of Motion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q4 Health Professions
Hiroto Kobune, Yoshiaki Kubo, Yasushi Fukuda, Yuto Matsuura, Takeyuki Kato, Koji Koyama
{"title":"Effect of Different Foam Rolling Sensitivities on the Amount of Change in Range of Motion: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Hiroto Kobune, Yoshiaki Kubo, Yasushi Fukuda, Yuto Matsuura, Takeyuki Kato, Koji Koyama","doi":"10.24018/ejsport.2023.3.5.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foam rolling (FR) is an easy-to-perform self-care activity to improve the range of motion in patients with injuries. However, even if FR is performed at the same intensity, the feeling differs depending on the patient. In addition, FR affects the contralateral side. This phenomenon is called cross education. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between FR sensitivities and FR efficacy. The secondary purpose was to determine how FR intensity perception influences cross education. In this study, FR sensitivity was calculated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The difference in the effect of FR sensitivity was evaluated using the correlation between the amount of change in PRE-test to POST- test ROM and VAS. The experimental procedure in this study first measures ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) on the left and right leg. Immediately after measurement, 3sets of FR were performed on one random leg. Participants wrote the VAS of FR for each set during the rest period of each FR intervention set. Immediately after 3 sets of FR, the ROM was measured in the left and right legs. Statistical analysis performed Two-way repeated measures ANOVA in group comparison. As a result, two-way ANOVA did not show a significant effect of group (F = 0.003, P = 0.95) or interaction effect (F = 2.28, P = 0.14). In contract, time had a significant effect (F = 39.65, P = 0.001). Post hoc result in [Dominant leg] PRE: 19.7 ± 7.6° POST: 22.2 ± 7.3° P = 0.001 Δ = 0.33. [Non-dominant leg] PRE: 20.0 ± 7.8° POST: 21.6 ± 7.8° P = 0.01, Δ = 0.21). On the other hand, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for the correlation between the amount of change in ROM and VAS. As a result, a dominant leg significant negative correlation was observed between the 3dr set of FR VAS score and the amount of change in ROM (r = -0.38, P = 0.04). Non-dominant leg significant correlations were observed third set of FR VAS score and amount of change in ROM (r = 0.41, P = 0.03). The result of this study suggested that it is necessary to perform FR with a comfortable stimulus on the dominant leg to maximize the effect of FR.","PeriodicalId":36509,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejsport.2023.3.5.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foam rolling (FR) is an easy-to-perform self-care activity to improve the range of motion in patients with injuries. However, even if FR is performed at the same intensity, the feeling differs depending on the patient. In addition, FR affects the contralateral side. This phenomenon is called cross education. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between FR sensitivities and FR efficacy. The secondary purpose was to determine how FR intensity perception influences cross education. In this study, FR sensitivity was calculated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The difference in the effect of FR sensitivity was evaluated using the correlation between the amount of change in PRE-test to POST- test ROM and VAS. The experimental procedure in this study first measures ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) on the left and right leg. Immediately after measurement, 3sets of FR were performed on one random leg. Participants wrote the VAS of FR for each set during the rest period of each FR intervention set. Immediately after 3 sets of FR, the ROM was measured in the left and right legs. Statistical analysis performed Two-way repeated measures ANOVA in group comparison. As a result, two-way ANOVA did not show a significant effect of group (F = 0.003, P = 0.95) or interaction effect (F = 2.28, P = 0.14). In contract, time had a significant effect (F = 39.65, P = 0.001). Post hoc result in [Dominant leg] PRE: 19.7 ± 7.6° POST: 22.2 ± 7.3° P = 0.001 Δ = 0.33. [Non-dominant leg] PRE: 20.0 ± 7.8° POST: 21.6 ± 7.8° P = 0.01, Δ = 0.21). On the other hand, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used for the correlation between the amount of change in ROM and VAS. As a result, a dominant leg significant negative correlation was observed between the 3dr set of FR VAS score and the amount of change in ROM (r = -0.38, P = 0.04). Non-dominant leg significant correlations were observed third set of FR VAS score and amount of change in ROM (r = 0.41, P = 0.03). The result of this study suggested that it is necessary to perform FR with a comfortable stimulus on the dominant leg to maximize the effect of FR.
不同泡沫滚动敏感性对运动范围变化量的影响:一项随机对照试验
泡沫滚动(FR)是一种易于执行的自我保健活动,可改善受伤患者的活动范围。然而,即使FR在相同的强度下进行,感觉也因患者而异。此外,FR影响对侧。这种现象被称为交叉教育。因此,本研究的主要目的是研究FR敏感性与FR疗效之间的关系。次要目的是确定FR强度感知如何影响交叉教育。本研究采用视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)计算FR敏感性。使用测试前到测试后ROM和VAS变化量之间的相关性来评估FR敏感性影响的差异。本研究的实验程序首先测量左腿和右腿的踝关节背屈活动范围(ROM)。测量后立即随机选取一条腿进行3组FR。参与者在每个FR干预组的休息期间为每组FR填写VAS。3组FR后立即测量左、右腿的ROM。组间比较采用双向重复测量方差分析。因此,双因素方差分析未显示组间效应(F = 0.003, P = 0.95)或交互效应(F = 2.28, P = 0.14)。在合同中,时间有显著影响(F = 39.65, P = 0.001)。[优势腿]PRE: 19.7±7.6°Post: 22.2±7.3°P = 0.001 Δ = 0.33。[非优势腿]PRE: 20.0±7.8°POST: 21.6±7.8°P = 0.01, Δ = 0.21)。另一方面,使用Pearson相关系数对ROM变化量与VAS之间的相关性进行分析。结果,3dr组FR VAS评分与ROM变化量呈显著负相关(r = -0.38, P = 0.04)。第三组FR VAS评分与ROM变化量呈非优势腿显著相关(r = 0.41, P = 0.03)。本研究结果表明,有必要在主腿上进行舒适的刺激,以最大限度地发挥FR的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine
Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信