Comparative analysis of methods to determine deflection in steel beams: theoretical analysis, finite element and experimental

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting

Journal of Technology Management and Innovation Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.35429/JTI.2020.21.7.32.37

Gabriela Alor-Saavedra, F. A. Alaffita-Hernández, B. Escobedo-Trujillo, O. Silva-Aguilar

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work makes a comparative study of two methods to determine deflection in steel beams: (a) Theoretical and (b) Finite element. For method (a) the solution of the differential equation associated with the modeling of the deflection of a beam is found, while for method (b) a simulation is made in Solidworks. Both methods are compared with experimental data in order to analyze which of the methods presents less uncertainty and show the usefulness of the theoretical part in the modeling of physical systems.

查看原文本刊更多论文

确定钢梁挠度方法的比较分析:理论分析、有限元和实验

本文比较研究了确定钢梁挠度的两种方法:(a)理论和(b)有限元。对于方法(a)找到了与梁挠度建模相关的微分方程的解，而对于方法(b)在Solidworks中进行了仿真。将这两种方法与实验数据进行比较，以分析哪一种方法的不确定性较小，并表明理论部分在物理系统建模中的有用性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Technology Management and Innovation Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： JOTMI is a quarterly indexed electronic journal, refereed and edited by Business and Economy Faculty at Alberto Hurtado University. Its mission is to publish original and novel literature in the fields of technology management and innovation; putting emphasis in topics relevant in a global fashion, remarking in Latin-Ibero-America and the Caribbean. The objective of the journal is to analyze the impact that global technological change has on society and to disseminate the best management practices of companies and organizations.