Comments of Academics to Department of Education's RFI Regarding Evaluating Undue Hardship Claims in Adversary Actions Seeking Student Loan Discharge in Bankruptcy Proceedings (Docket No. Ed–2017–Ope–0085)

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Dalié Jiménez, M. Bruckner, Pamela Foohey, Brook E. Gotberg, Chrystin D. Ondersma
{"title":"Comments of Academics to Department of Education's RFI Regarding Evaluating Undue Hardship Claims in Adversary Actions Seeking Student Loan Discharge in Bankruptcy Proceedings (Docket No. Ed–2017–Ope–0085)","authors":"Dalié Jiménez, M. Bruckner, Pamela Foohey, Brook E. Gotberg, Chrystin D. Ondersma","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3183893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a response to the Department of Education's request for information regarding evaluating undue hardship claims in adversary actions seeking student loan discharge in bankruptcy proceedings. \nAlthough by law student loan borrowers may receive a discharge of their student loans when repayment would constitute an “undue hardship,” in practice many borrowers who would qualify for such a discharge in bankruptcy do not receive it. This proposal recommends changes to the Department of Education’s (the “Department”) policies and regulations that govern federal loan guarantors and loan servicers. The proposal would facilitate the appropriate discharge of student loans by establishing ten categories of borrower circumstances under which the Department would agree to the borrower’s discharge of federal student loans. The aim of the proposal is to establish clear, easy-to-verify, dire circumstances that merit the Department’s acquiescence to a student loan discharge and thereby promote the efficient use of taxpayer funds. Taxpayer funds should not be used to challenge a debtor’s discharge of her student loans where undue hardship is clearly present, or where the costs to fight a discharge are disproportionate to the likely recovery.","PeriodicalId":44862,"journal":{"name":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Bankruptcy Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3183893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This is a response to the Department of Education's request for information regarding evaluating undue hardship claims in adversary actions seeking student loan discharge in bankruptcy proceedings. Although by law student loan borrowers may receive a discharge of their student loans when repayment would constitute an “undue hardship,” in practice many borrowers who would qualify for such a discharge in bankruptcy do not receive it. This proposal recommends changes to the Department of Education’s (the “Department”) policies and regulations that govern federal loan guarantors and loan servicers. The proposal would facilitate the appropriate discharge of student loans by establishing ten categories of borrower circumstances under which the Department would agree to the borrower’s discharge of federal student loans. The aim of the proposal is to establish clear, easy-to-verify, dire circumstances that merit the Department’s acquiescence to a student loan discharge and thereby promote the efficient use of taxpayer funds. Taxpayer funds should not be used to challenge a debtor’s discharge of her student loans where undue hardship is clearly present, or where the costs to fight a discharge are disproportionate to the likely recovery.
学者对教育部RFI关于在破产程序中寻求解除学生贷款的敌对诉讼中评估不当困难索赔的意见(摘要号。ed - 2017开放- 0085)
这是对教育部要求提供有关在破产程序中寻求学生贷款免除的对手诉讼中评估不当困难索赔的信息的回应。虽然根据法律规定,当还款构成“过度困难”时,学生贷款借款人可能会获得学生贷款的免除,但在实践中,许多有资格在破产中获得这种免除的借款人并没有得到这种免除。该提案建议修改教育部(“部门”)管理联邦贷款担保人和贷款服务商的政策和法规。该提案将通过建立十类借款人情况来促进学生贷款的适当发放,在这些情况下,教育部将同意借款人发放联邦学生贷款。这项建议的目的是确立明确、易于核查、值得教育部默许免除学生贷款的严峻情况,从而促进纳税人资金的有效使用。纳税人的资金不应该被用来质疑债务人对其学生贷款的免除,如果不适当的困难明显存在,或者为免除而斗争的成本与可能的收回不成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信