La fede e le opere per la giustificazione nella lettera di Giacomo e in Paolo: il motivo ideologico della Riforma

Storicamente Pub Date : 2020-06-06 DOI:10.12977/stor787
G. Marconi
{"title":"La fede e le opere per la giustificazione nella lettera di Giacomo e in Paolo: il motivo ideologico della Riforma","authors":"G. Marconi","doi":"10.12977/stor787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Presence of a Trend affiliated to James in the jewish-christian Mouvement legitimates the Polemic about the Justification of James 2 to Rm 3 and Gal 2. In this context there is the controversy regarding the Pauline theory of justification, which however does not intend to replace the works for faith but to elevate the works to the role of verifying the faith, just as in the first part of the same chapter according to he had made faith the judgment criterion of history","PeriodicalId":29985,"journal":{"name":"Storicamente","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Storicamente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12977/stor787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Presence of a Trend affiliated to James in the jewish-christian Mouvement legitimates the Polemic about the Justification of James 2 to Rm 3 and Gal 2. In this context there is the controversy regarding the Pauline theory of justification, which however does not intend to replace the works for faith but to elevate the works to the role of verifying the faith, just as in the first part of the same chapter according to he had made faith the judgment criterion of history
雅各书和保罗书中的信仰和正当性:改革的意识形态原因
在犹太-基督教运动中,与雅各有关的趋势的存在使雅各书2章到罗3章和加拉太书2章称义的争论合法化。在这种背景下,有关于保罗称义理论的争议,然而,它并不打算取代信仰的行为,而是将行为提升到验证信仰的角色,就像在同一章的第一部分,根据他把信仰作为历史的判断标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信