Efficacy of intra-articular methylprednisolone along with platelet rich plasma vs. platelet rich plasma in early osteoarthritis: a retrospective study

Ketas Mahajan, Sneh Dudhia
{"title":"Efficacy of intra-articular methylprednisolone along with platelet rich plasma vs. platelet rich plasma in early osteoarthritis: a retrospective study","authors":"Ketas Mahajan, Sneh Dudhia","doi":"10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20214115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Increased prevalence as well as burden affecting osteoarthritis of knee joint has led to increase in concerns regarding safety of various pharmacological methods. Hence, there is an increase in demand for newer and effective strategies for treatment and manage­ment. Thus, a novel alternate for treatment is required that might repair damage to cartilage rather than simply reduce related symptoms. The aim of this study was to study the efficacy of intra-articular methylprednisolone along with platelet rich plasma versus platelet rich plasma in early knee osteoarthritis. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 60 patients diagnosed with initial stages of osteoarthritis of knee according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification. Patients age range was between 40 to 80 years who were divided into 2 groups; group I: It contained 30 subjects treated with intra-articular injections of Platelet Rich Plasma in combination with methylprednisolone and group II: comprised of 30 patients treated with intra-articular injection of Platelet rich Plasma alone. Clinical data pertaining to medical history, VAS and KOOS scores were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the student’s t test. Results: Statistically significant improvements in VAS and KOOS score values were observed on assessment of scores at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months intervals, respectively. Conclusions: It can be concluded from the study that a combination therapy of intra-articular injection of combination of PRP with methylprednisolone yields superior results when compared to use of PRP injections alone.","PeriodicalId":13901,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20214115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increased prevalence as well as burden affecting osteoarthritis of knee joint has led to increase in concerns regarding safety of various pharmacological methods. Hence, there is an increase in demand for newer and effective strategies for treatment and manage­ment. Thus, a novel alternate for treatment is required that might repair damage to cartilage rather than simply reduce related symptoms. The aim of this study was to study the efficacy of intra-articular methylprednisolone along with platelet rich plasma versus platelet rich plasma in early knee osteoarthritis. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 60 patients diagnosed with initial stages of osteoarthritis of knee according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification. Patients age range was between 40 to 80 years who were divided into 2 groups; group I: It contained 30 subjects treated with intra-articular injections of Platelet Rich Plasma in combination with methylprednisolone and group II: comprised of 30 patients treated with intra-articular injection of Platelet rich Plasma alone. Clinical data pertaining to medical history, VAS and KOOS scores were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using the student’s t test. Results: Statistically significant improvements in VAS and KOOS score values were observed on assessment of scores at baseline, 1, 3 and 6 months intervals, respectively. Conclusions: It can be concluded from the study that a combination therapy of intra-articular injection of combination of PRP with methylprednisolone yields superior results when compared to use of PRP injections alone.
关节内甲基强的松龙联合富血小板血浆与富血小板血浆治疗早期骨关节炎的疗效:回顾性研究
背景:膝关节骨关节炎患病率的增加和负担的增加导致人们越来越关注各种药物治疗方法的安全性。因此,对更新和有效的治疗和管理策略的需求增加。因此,需要一种新的替代治疗方法来修复软骨损伤,而不是简单地减轻相关症状。本研究的目的是研究关节内甲基强的松龙联合富血小板血浆与富血小板血浆治疗早期膝关节骨关节炎的疗效。方法:对60例根据Kellgren-Lawrence分类法诊断为早期膝关节骨关节炎的患者进行回顾性研究。患者年龄在40 ~ 80岁之间,分为两组;第一组:30例患者关节内注射富血小板血浆联合甲泼尼龙治疗;第二组:30例患者关节内注射富血小板血浆联合甲泼尼龙治疗。收集有关病史、VAS和KOOS评分的临床资料。采用学生t检验进行统计分析。结果:分别在基线、1个月、3个月和6个月时进行评分,观察到VAS和kos评分值有统计学意义的改善。结论:从研究中可以得出结论,与单独使用PRP注射相比,关节内注射联合PRP与甲基强的松龙的联合治疗效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信