COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SLEEPER STRETCH AND CROSS BODY STRETCH FOR IMPROVING POSTERIOR SHOULDER TIGHTNESS, PAIN AND FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS – A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL"

IF 0.1 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Yavanika, M. Meena
{"title":"COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SLEEPER STRETCH AND CROSS BODY STRETCH FOR IMPROVING POSTERIOR SHOULDER TIGHTNESS, PAIN AND FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH ADHESIVE CAPSULITIS – A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL\"","authors":"Yavanika, M. Meena","doi":"10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i2/662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adhesive Capsulitis usually involves the posterior capsule tightness, which can be stretched either by sleepers or cross-body stretch techniques. The present study aimed to compare and see the effectiveness of two stretching techniques on horizontal adduction and internal rotation range of motion along with pain and disability. Methodology: The study was conducted on 30 subjects diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis (12 females and 18 males) of age group 40-65 years and meeting the inclusion as well as the exclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into three groupsCross body stretch group (Group 1), Sleeper Stretch group (Group 2), and Control group (Group 3) randomly. Both groups 1 & 2 received the intervention given to group 3 along with the different stretching techniques three times a week for four weeks. Clinical outcome measures were horizontal adduction and internal rotation as measured with a goniometer, pain intensity on a numeric pain rating scale, and shoulder disability with the help of shoulder pain and disability index. Result: Data was collected at baseline and after four weeks of intervention in all three groups. Data were checked for normal distribution. For non-normally distributed data, Kruskal Wallis test-Pain (p-value> 0.419) and Function (p-value>0.665) and for normally distributed data, one-way repeated measure ANOVA-Shoulder Horizontal Adduction (p-value>0.284) and Internal Rotation (p-value>0.334) was used and the p-value was fixed to < 0.05. Conclusion: Both the type of stretches were equally effective for four weeks.","PeriodicalId":42989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15621/ijphy/2020/v7i2/662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adhesive Capsulitis usually involves the posterior capsule tightness, which can be stretched either by sleepers or cross-body stretch techniques. The present study aimed to compare and see the effectiveness of two stretching techniques on horizontal adduction and internal rotation range of motion along with pain and disability. Methodology: The study was conducted on 30 subjects diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis (12 females and 18 males) of age group 40-65 years and meeting the inclusion as well as the exclusion criteria. Subjects were divided into three groupsCross body stretch group (Group 1), Sleeper Stretch group (Group 2), and Control group (Group 3) randomly. Both groups 1 & 2 received the intervention given to group 3 along with the different stretching techniques three times a week for four weeks. Clinical outcome measures were horizontal adduction and internal rotation as measured with a goniometer, pain intensity on a numeric pain rating scale, and shoulder disability with the help of shoulder pain and disability index. Result: Data was collected at baseline and after four weeks of intervention in all three groups. Data were checked for normal distribution. For non-normally distributed data, Kruskal Wallis test-Pain (p-value> 0.419) and Function (p-value>0.665) and for normally distributed data, one-way repeated measure ANOVA-Shoulder Horizontal Adduction (p-value>0.284) and Internal Rotation (p-value>0.334) was used and the p-value was fixed to < 0.05. Conclusion: Both the type of stretches were equally effective for four weeks.
枕骨拉伸和横卧拉伸对改善粘连性囊炎患者后肩紧绷、疼痛和功能的比较效果——一项随机对照试验
背景:粘连性囊炎通常涉及后囊膜紧绷,可通过睡眠者或跨体拉伸技术进行拉伸。本研究旨在比较和观察两种拉伸技术在水平内收和内旋活动范围以及疼痛和残疾方面的有效性。方法:研究对象为30例确诊为黏附性囊炎的患者,年龄40 ~ 65岁,符合纳入标准和排除标准,其中女性12例,男性18例。将受试者随机分为3组:横体拉伸组(1组)、睡眠拉伸组(2组)和对照组(3组)。第1组和第2组均接受第3组的干预措施以及不同的拉伸技术,每周三次,持续四周。临床结果测量是用测角仪测量水平内收和内旋,用数字疼痛评定量表测量疼痛强度,用肩部疼痛和残疾指数测量肩部残疾。结果:三组均在基线和干预四周后收集数据。检验数据是否为正态分布。对于非正态分布的数据,采用Kruskal Wallis检验- pain (p值> 0.419)和Function (p值>0.665);对于正态分布的数据,采用单向重复测量anova -肩关节水平内收(p值>0.284)和内旋(p值>0.334),p值固定为< 0.05。结论:两种拉伸方式在四周内效果相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信