Chikungunya confused with dengue in Malaysia: Clinical, serological and molecular perspective

Umi Kalsom Ali, I. Isahak, M. Rahman
{"title":"Chikungunya confused with dengue in Malaysia: Clinical, serological and molecular perspective","authors":"Umi Kalsom Ali, I. Isahak, M. Rahman","doi":"10.5580/647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was to observe clinical, serolgical and molecular diagnosis of chikungunya viral fever patients and its comparison with dengue viral fever. For that 49 serologically negative dengue patients but clinically dengue like symptomms were included. Clinical investigation was carried out recording different profiles of hospitalized patients. Serology was performed using the Onsite® Chikungunya IgM Combo rapid test and molecular test RT-PCR was performed to detect the virus in the patients sera. It was observed that out of them 19 (38.7 %) were serologically confirmed chikungunya infection. Interestingly molecular detection of the patients sera did not show the presence chikungunya virus but detected dengue virus from 9 patients’s sera. Classical clinical features of chikungunya virus infected patients were recorded to differentiate chikungunya from dengue, which were fever, arthralgia, myalgia and rash. Detection of chikungunya IgM in these cohort means that this virus is circulating throughout the year although not as many as dengue. Laboratory confirmation is important to differentiate chikungunya fever from dengue fever. This study adds some information in local data and hopefully can help the clinicians to clinically and laboratory diagnosis and management of chikungunya infection in outbreak and non-outbreak setting. Serology was proven to be useful in confirming chikungunya infection.","PeriodicalId":22514,"journal":{"name":"The Internet journal of microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study was to observe clinical, serolgical and molecular diagnosis of chikungunya viral fever patients and its comparison with dengue viral fever. For that 49 serologically negative dengue patients but clinically dengue like symptomms were included. Clinical investigation was carried out recording different profiles of hospitalized patients. Serology was performed using the Onsite® Chikungunya IgM Combo rapid test and molecular test RT-PCR was performed to detect the virus in the patients sera. It was observed that out of them 19 (38.7 %) were serologically confirmed chikungunya infection. Interestingly molecular detection of the patients sera did not show the presence chikungunya virus but detected dengue virus from 9 patients’s sera. Classical clinical features of chikungunya virus infected patients were recorded to differentiate chikungunya from dengue, which were fever, arthralgia, myalgia and rash. Detection of chikungunya IgM in these cohort means that this virus is circulating throughout the year although not as many as dengue. Laboratory confirmation is important to differentiate chikungunya fever from dengue fever. This study adds some information in local data and hopefully can help the clinicians to clinically and laboratory diagnosis and management of chikungunya infection in outbreak and non-outbreak setting. Serology was proven to be useful in confirming chikungunya infection.
基孔肯雅热在马来西亚与登革热混淆:临床、血清学和分子观点
本研究旨在观察基孔肯雅病毒热患者的临床、血清学和分子诊断,并与登革热病毒热进行比较。其中包括49例血清学阴性但临床有登革热样症状的登革热患者。进行临床调查,记录住院患者的不同概况。采用Onsite®基孔肯雅IgM组合快速检测进行血清学检测,采用分子检测RT-PCR检测患者血清中的病毒。其中19例(38.7%)血清学确诊为基孔肯雅热感染。有趣的是,患者血清分子检测未发现基孔肯雅病毒,但在9例患者血清中检测到登革热病毒。记录基孔肯雅病毒感染患者的典型临床特征,以区分基孔肯雅与登革热,主要表现为发热、关节痛、肌痛和皮疹。在这些人群中检测到基孔肯雅IgM意味着这种病毒虽然没有登革热那么多,但全年都在传播。实验室确认对于区分基孔肯雅热和登革热很重要。本研究在当地数据中增加了一些信息,希望能帮助临床医生在暴发和非暴发环境中对基孔肯雅感染进行临床和实验室诊断和管理。已证明血清学在确认基孔肯雅热感染方面是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信