A comparative assessment of additional bibliometric indexes in the case of a large excess of citations in relation to the h-index core

Q4 Engineering

Technische Mechanik Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.17814/mechanik.2023.7.15

W. Grzesik

引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparative assessment of citations based on additional bibliometric indicators and related to the excess of citations beyond that required for a given h -index is presented. The analysis was based on data from publications and the ranking in the category of scientific careers (“World’s TOP2% Most Influenced Scientists List”) published in 2022; two additional indicators were introduced: g and h g . Numerous examples of the desirability and legitimacy of such an analysis for scientists from various scientific disciplines are given.

查看原文本刊更多论文

在与h指数核心相关的大量超额引用的情况下，对其他文献计量指标进行比较评估

本文提出了一种基于其他文献计量指标的引文比较性评价方法，该方法与超出给定h -指数所需的引用数有关。该分析基于出版物的数据和2022年发布的科学职业类别排名(“全球最具影响力科学家排行榜TOP2%”);引入了另外两个指标:g和h g。对于来自不同科学学科的科学家来说，这种分析的可取性和合法性给出了许多例子。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Technische Mechanik Engineering-Mechanical Engineering

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： In technical mechanics , peer-reviewed papers from all fields of mechanics are published. A major concern is the rapid availability of research results for industry and science. In this sense, especially those contributions are preferred, which include not only new results and findings but also their practical application. The journal Engineering Mechanics publishes refereed original articles on Engineering Mechanics in its broadest sense. It is intended to provide a forum for a rapid transfer of research results to industry and science. In that sense contributions are encouraged the practical application of new results and scientific findings.