Chronic Use of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues (SSAs) and Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): An Under-recognized Adverse Effect.

M. Wasif Saif, A. Romano, M. Smith, Rachana Patel, V. Relias
{"title":"Chronic Use of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues (SSAs) and Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) in Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (GEP-NETs): An Under-recognized Adverse Effect.","authors":"M. Wasif Saif, A. Romano, M. Smith, Rachana Patel, V. Relias","doi":"10.46619/CMJ.2020.3-1023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nSomatostatin Analogues (SSAs) are used to treat Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and acromegaly. Side effects of SAAs usually include biliary disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, injection-site pain and hyperglycemia. Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) is often misdiagnosed as disease progression or failure to SAAs or diagnosed after a delay in patients receiving SAAs. We present our experience with EPI developing in patients following use of SAAs.\n\n\nMethods\nWe reviewed chart and pharmacy records of 110 GEP-NETs patients who received SSAs. Data was collected including demographics, pathology, stage, dose/duration of long and short-acting SA, use of antidiarrheal, pancreatic enzyme replacement (PER), proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or H2 blockers). Laboratory data include chromogranin-A (CgA), urine 5-HIAA and quantitative fecal fat test (QFFT) or fecal elastase test (FE). EPI was defined by a FE below normal level OR by a reduction of ≥ 21.2% or steatorrhea on QFFT. Patients who were identified to develop EPI were treated with pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy (PERT).\n\n\nResults\nAmong, 110 GEP-NETs patients, 104 received LA Octreotide and 6 Somatuline Depot Injection. Of these, 23 received short-acting SSA for worsening diarrhea, 96 had intensification of antidiarrheal and 1 got telotristat ethyl. QFFT confirmed EPI in 19, 11 based on clinical symptoms, and 16 had sample error or refusal to collect specimen. CTCAE 4.0 grades of EPI were: grade 2(69%), grade 3(22%) and grade 4(9%). Median time to development of EPI was 12 months (95%CI 3 - 23). Except 1, all patients received PERT either with concomitant PPI (13) or later if no improvement with PERT (6) and 2 on H2 blockers. 37% of the patients had improvement in EPI within 4-8 weeks. Deficiency of vitamins and trace elements was found in 11 of 19 patients, who received supplementation.\n\n\nConclusions\nOur experience constitutes the first and the largest study addressing EPI as a rare but serious complication of chronic use of SAAs. Although SAAs are used to treat diarrhea, paradoxically they can worsen diarrhea secondary to EPI. Early recognition and diagnosis of this under-diagnosed and under-reported side effect of SAAs, such as EPI, can improve not only diarrhea and weight loss in these patients but also can reduce cost of using short-acting SAAs and antidiarrheal.","PeriodicalId":72513,"journal":{"name":"Cancer medicine journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer medicine journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46619/CMJ.2020.3-1023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background Somatostatin Analogues (SSAs) are used to treat Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) and acromegaly. Side effects of SAAs usually include biliary disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, injection-site pain and hyperglycemia. Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency (EPI) is often misdiagnosed as disease progression or failure to SAAs or diagnosed after a delay in patients receiving SAAs. We present our experience with EPI developing in patients following use of SAAs. Methods We reviewed chart and pharmacy records of 110 GEP-NETs patients who received SSAs. Data was collected including demographics, pathology, stage, dose/duration of long and short-acting SA, use of antidiarrheal, pancreatic enzyme replacement (PER), proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or H2 blockers). Laboratory data include chromogranin-A (CgA), urine 5-HIAA and quantitative fecal fat test (QFFT) or fecal elastase test (FE). EPI was defined by a FE below normal level OR by a reduction of ≥ 21.2% or steatorrhea on QFFT. Patients who were identified to develop EPI were treated with pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy (PERT). Results Among, 110 GEP-NETs patients, 104 received LA Octreotide and 6 Somatuline Depot Injection. Of these, 23 received short-acting SSA for worsening diarrhea, 96 had intensification of antidiarrheal and 1 got telotristat ethyl. QFFT confirmed EPI in 19, 11 based on clinical symptoms, and 16 had sample error or refusal to collect specimen. CTCAE 4.0 grades of EPI were: grade 2(69%), grade 3(22%) and grade 4(9%). Median time to development of EPI was 12 months (95%CI 3 - 23). Except 1, all patients received PERT either with concomitant PPI (13) or later if no improvement with PERT (6) and 2 on H2 blockers. 37% of the patients had improvement in EPI within 4-8 weeks. Deficiency of vitamins and trace elements was found in 11 of 19 patients, who received supplementation. Conclusions Our experience constitutes the first and the largest study addressing EPI as a rare but serious complication of chronic use of SAAs. Although SAAs are used to treat diarrhea, paradoxically they can worsen diarrhea secondary to EPI. Early recognition and diagnosis of this under-diagnosed and under-reported side effect of SAAs, such as EPI, can improve not only diarrhea and weight loss in these patients but also can reduce cost of using short-acting SAAs and antidiarrheal.
胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NETs)患者长期使用长效生长抑素类似物(SSAs)和外分泌胰腺功能不全(EPI):一个未被认识到的不良反应。
生长抑素类似物(SSAs)被用于治疗胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤(GEP-NETs)和肢端肥大症。SAAs的副作用通常包括胆道疾病、胃肠道疾病、注射部位疼痛和高血糖。外分泌性胰腺功能不全(EPI)经常被误诊为疾病进展或SAAs失败,或在患者接受SAAs后延迟诊断。我们介绍了使用SAAs后患者EPI发展的经验。方法回顾110例接受SSAs治疗的GEP-NETs患者的病历和用药记录。收集的数据包括人口统计学、病理、分期、长效和短效SA的剂量/持续时间、止泻药、胰酶替代(PER)、质子泵抑制剂(PPI)或H2阻滞剂的使用。实验室数据包括嗜铬粒蛋白a (CgA)、尿5-HIAA和定量粪便脂肪试验(QFFT)或粪便弹性酶试验(FE)。EPI的定义是FE低于正常水平或QFFT减少≥21.2%或脂肪溢。确诊为EPI的患者接受胰腺外分泌替代疗法(PERT)治疗。结果110例GEP-NETs患者中,104例使用LA奥曲肽,6例使用Somatuline Depot注射液。其中23例因腹泻加重而接受短效SSA治疗,96例强化止泻剂治疗,1例使用特立司他乙基。QFFT确诊EPI 19例,临床症状11例,样本错误或拒绝采集标本16例。EPI的CTCAE 4.0等级为:2级(69%)、3级(22%)和4级(9%)。EPI发展的中位时间为12个月(95%CI 3 - 23)。除1外,所有患者都接受了PERT治疗,要么同时接受PPI治疗(13),要么在使用PERT治疗没有改善的情况下(6)接受了PERT治疗(2)。37%的患者在4-8周内EPI改善。服用补充剂的19名患者中有11人缺乏维生素和微量元素。我们的经验是第一个也是最大的研究,将EPI作为长期使用SAAs的罕见但严重的并发症。虽然SAAs用于治疗腹泻,矛盾的是,他们可以加重腹泻继发于EPI。早期识别和诊断SAAs的这种未被诊断和报告的副作用,如EPI,不仅可以改善这些患者的腹泻和体重减轻,还可以降低使用短效SAAs和止泻药的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信