Endoscopic signs of gastroesophageal reflux disease with different hiatal hernias types

IF 0.1 Q4 PATHOLOGY
A. Nykonenko, Ye. I. Haidarzhi, О. М. Kiosov
{"title":"Endoscopic signs of gastroesophageal reflux disease with different hiatal hernias types","authors":"A. Nykonenko, Ye. I. Haidarzhi, О. М. Kiosov","doi":"10.14739/2310-1237.2022.1.252191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A hiatal hernia occurs in 83–94 % of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Difficulties in diagnosing endoscopic signs of gastroesophageal reflux with combination of the most common hiatal hernia types remain relevant. Untimely and inaccurate endoscopic interpretation of these pathological changes significantly reduces the effectiveness of treatment.\nThe aim of the research was to study the endoscopic signs of gastroesophageal reflux disease with the most common hiatal hernia type I and type III.\nMaterials and methods. The examination results of 153 patients with GERD and the most common hiatal hernia type I and type III at the stage of preparation for antireflux surgical treatment were analyzed. The age was 54.5 ± 11.3, there were 48 (31.4 %) men, 105 (68.6 %) women. In Group I – 85 patients with GERD and type I hiatal hernia, in Group II – 68 patients with GERD and type III hiatal hernia. A complete preoperative examination necessarily included endoscopy with chromoendoscopy (mainly NBI or FICE), biopsy from suspicious foci of the gastric mucosa and the lower third of the esophagus followed by histological analysis. Statistical processing and mathematical analysis of the obtained results were performed using the Statistica for Windows 13 (StatSoft Inc., No. JPZ804I382130ARCN10-J). For comparative analysis the arithmetic mean and standard deviation were calculated and presented as M ± s. Differences between groups were assessed using the sub-module “Difference tests” in the module “Basic statistics and tables”. Differences at P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.\nResults. In both groups, non-erosive forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease prevailed: 57 (67.1 %) and 39 (57.4 %) patients respectively. Both in Groups I and II, among the erosive forms there were mainly LA A stages of esophagitis – 20 (23.5 %) and 17 (25.0 %). СLE signs of the esophageal mucosa prevailed in Group I – 16 (18.8 %) patients, in Group II – 5 (7.4 %) patients. The proximal edges of the gastric folds, which are visualized in all patients, were considered the reference point for the true esophageal-gastric junction. Complicated course of GERD was noted in both groups of patients.\nConclusions. Endoscopic signs of GERD with hiatal hernia type I or type III have characteristic features, the severity of which manifestation does not depend on the type. A reliable indicator of the true esophageal-gastric junction location is the proximal edge of the gastric folds. Complicated course of GERD occurs in both groups: Barrett’s esophagus and Schatzki’s ring predominate in the Group I, strictures and ulcers of the esophagus – in the Group II.","PeriodicalId":41645,"journal":{"name":"Pathologia","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14739/2310-1237.2022.1.252191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A hiatal hernia occurs in 83–94 % of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Difficulties in diagnosing endoscopic signs of gastroesophageal reflux with combination of the most common hiatal hernia types remain relevant. Untimely and inaccurate endoscopic interpretation of these pathological changes significantly reduces the effectiveness of treatment. The aim of the research was to study the endoscopic signs of gastroesophageal reflux disease with the most common hiatal hernia type I and type III. Materials and methods. The examination results of 153 patients with GERD and the most common hiatal hernia type I and type III at the stage of preparation for antireflux surgical treatment were analyzed. The age was 54.5 ± 11.3, there were 48 (31.4 %) men, 105 (68.6 %) women. In Group I – 85 patients with GERD and type I hiatal hernia, in Group II – 68 patients with GERD and type III hiatal hernia. A complete preoperative examination necessarily included endoscopy with chromoendoscopy (mainly NBI or FICE), biopsy from suspicious foci of the gastric mucosa and the lower third of the esophagus followed by histological analysis. Statistical processing and mathematical analysis of the obtained results were performed using the Statistica for Windows 13 (StatSoft Inc., No. JPZ804I382130ARCN10-J). For comparative analysis the arithmetic mean and standard deviation were calculated and presented as M ± s. Differences between groups were assessed using the sub-module “Difference tests” in the module “Basic statistics and tables”. Differences at P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results. In both groups, non-erosive forms of gastroesophageal reflux disease prevailed: 57 (67.1 %) and 39 (57.4 %) patients respectively. Both in Groups I and II, among the erosive forms there were mainly LA A stages of esophagitis – 20 (23.5 %) and 17 (25.0 %). СLE signs of the esophageal mucosa prevailed in Group I – 16 (18.8 %) patients, in Group II – 5 (7.4 %) patients. The proximal edges of the gastric folds, which are visualized in all patients, were considered the reference point for the true esophageal-gastric junction. Complicated course of GERD was noted in both groups of patients. Conclusions. Endoscopic signs of GERD with hiatal hernia type I or type III have characteristic features, the severity of which manifestation does not depend on the type. A reliable indicator of the true esophageal-gastric junction location is the proximal edge of the gastric folds. Complicated course of GERD occurs in both groups: Barrett’s esophagus and Schatzki’s ring predominate in the Group I, strictures and ulcers of the esophagus – in the Group II.
不同裂孔疝类型胃食管反流病的内镜征象
83 - 94%的胃食管反流病(GERD)患者发生裂孔疝。诊断胃食管反流的内镜征象与最常见的裂孔疝类型相结合的困难仍然相关。不及时和不准确的内镜解释这些病理变化显著降低治疗的有效性。本研究的目的是研究以I型和III型裂孔疝为最常见的胃食管反流病的内镜征象。材料和方法。分析153例胃食管反流及最常见的I型和III型裂孔疝患者在抗反流手术治疗准备阶段的检查结果。年龄54.5±11.3岁,男性48例(31.4%),女性105例(68.6%)。第一组有85例GERD合并I型裂孔疝,第二组有68例GERD合并III型裂孔疝。完整的术前检查必须包括彩色内镜检查(主要是NBI或FICE),可疑灶胃黏膜和食管下三分之一活检,然后进行组织学分析。使用Statistica for Windows 13 (StatSoft Inc., No. 5)对所得结果进行统计处理和数学分析。JPZ804I382130ARCN10-J)。为了进行比较分析,计算算术平均值和标准差,并以M±s表示。使用“基本统计与表”模块中的“差异检验”子模块评估组间差异。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。在两组中,非糜烂性胃食管反流疾病占多数:分别为57例(67.1%)和39例(57.4%)。I组和II组糜烂形式中以LA A期食管炎为主,分别为20例(23.5%)和17例(25.0%)。СLE食管黏膜征象在I - 16组(18.8%)和II - 5组(7.4%)患者中普遍存在。在所有患者中可见的胃褶皱近端边缘被认为是真正食管-胃交界处的参考点。两组患者均出现胃食管反流的复杂病程。I型或III型胃食管反流并裂孔疝的内镜征象具有特征性,其表现的严重程度与类型无关。判断食管-胃交界处位置的可靠指标是胃褶的近端边缘。两组胃食管反流的病程均较为复杂:第一组以Barrett食管和Schatzki食管环为主,第二组以食管狭窄和溃疡为主。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathologia
Pathologia PATHOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书