Populations at Risk

D. Pedersen, Randy Young, Rose, E. Vernon
{"title":"Populations at Risk","authors":"D. Pedersen, Randy Young, Rose, E. Vernon","doi":"10.1002/0471435139.TOX110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of industrial hygiene and toxicology both involve recognition, as well as anticipation of the potential for occupational health problems. In the anticipation and/or recognition phase, an assessment of the risk to health or well-being resulting from exposure to an agent (chemical, physical, or biological) is made. This phase usually involves identifying the agents to which workers are or might be exposed; assessing the agents' properties, including toxicity; and understanding the conditions surrounding the use of, or interaction with, the agents. This information allows occupational health and safety professionals to make a preliminary assessment of occupational health risk based on the inherent properties of chemical, physical, or biological agents combined with the potential for contact or exposure under actual use conditions, including environmental level and in-use exposure control measures. The two basic applications of the anticipation/recognition process can be classified as either individual or aggregate. \n \n \n \nThe individual process is used by occupational health and safety practitioners who apply anticipation and recognition techniques to the exposure and conditions of exposure prevalent in a single facility or group of facilities under his or her professional jurisdiction. In that process, the individual professional needs an understanding of the toxic properties of those agents associated with these specific workplaces or processes and an understanding of the conditions of exposure existing in those situations. The data necessary for the individual process have been available to the practitioner for quite some time, either through the scientific literature or through investigation in the workplaces under his or her jurisdiction, with the possible historical exception of accurate information regarding the formulation of trade-named products. \n \n \n \nThe broader aggregate process of anticipation and recognition is applicable to definable industrial or occupational populations, and is an assessment of the potential risk of these populations for adverse health effects due to occupational exposure to chemical, physical, or biological agents in the workplace. The aggregate approach is common to occupational health and safety researchers, regulatory bodies, and others interested in the extent of exposure to a specific agent or list of agents with known adverse health effects. For example, in the initial stages of an epidemiologic study, researchers might wish to identify populations of workers who are exposed to a specific agent or group of agents. Government agencies need a measure of the potential impact of research or regulatory efforts based on the number of industries and workers impacted when they decide on the priorities to assign to research or regulatory efforts or the development of occupational health standards. This type of data was not available until after the implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, and required several efforts by the federal government. \n \n \n \nThis aggregate approach to the identification of worker populations at risk due to their occupational exposures to specific individual or grouped chemical agents also serves the general occupational health community by profiling the industries in which exposure may occur, thereby permitting an assessment of the relative potential for specific adverse health effects in selected industries. This type of broad overview is not normally available to the individual occupational health practitioner, and has the potential for improving the practitioner's initial assessment of occupational risk in his or her area of responsibility. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \nPopulations; \nRisk; \nData source; \nData display; \nDisplay of estimates; \nNOES workers exposed; \nIndustry exposure; \nIndustrial chemicals; \nCalculations","PeriodicalId":19820,"journal":{"name":"Patty's Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patty's Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/0471435139.TOX110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The practice of industrial hygiene and toxicology both involve recognition, as well as anticipation of the potential for occupational health problems. In the anticipation and/or recognition phase, an assessment of the risk to health or well-being resulting from exposure to an agent (chemical, physical, or biological) is made. This phase usually involves identifying the agents to which workers are or might be exposed; assessing the agents' properties, including toxicity; and understanding the conditions surrounding the use of, or interaction with, the agents. This information allows occupational health and safety professionals to make a preliminary assessment of occupational health risk based on the inherent properties of chemical, physical, or biological agents combined with the potential for contact or exposure under actual use conditions, including environmental level and in-use exposure control measures. The two basic applications of the anticipation/recognition process can be classified as either individual or aggregate. The individual process is used by occupational health and safety practitioners who apply anticipation and recognition techniques to the exposure and conditions of exposure prevalent in a single facility or group of facilities under his or her professional jurisdiction. In that process, the individual professional needs an understanding of the toxic properties of those agents associated with these specific workplaces or processes and an understanding of the conditions of exposure existing in those situations. The data necessary for the individual process have been available to the practitioner for quite some time, either through the scientific literature or through investigation in the workplaces under his or her jurisdiction, with the possible historical exception of accurate information regarding the formulation of trade-named products. The broader aggregate process of anticipation and recognition is applicable to definable industrial or occupational populations, and is an assessment of the potential risk of these populations for adverse health effects due to occupational exposure to chemical, physical, or biological agents in the workplace. The aggregate approach is common to occupational health and safety researchers, regulatory bodies, and others interested in the extent of exposure to a specific agent or list of agents with known adverse health effects. For example, in the initial stages of an epidemiologic study, researchers might wish to identify populations of workers who are exposed to a specific agent or group of agents. Government agencies need a measure of the potential impact of research or regulatory efforts based on the number of industries and workers impacted when they decide on the priorities to assign to research or regulatory efforts or the development of occupational health standards. This type of data was not available until after the implementation of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, and required several efforts by the federal government. This aggregate approach to the identification of worker populations at risk due to their occupational exposures to specific individual or grouped chemical agents also serves the general occupational health community by profiling the industries in which exposure may occur, thereby permitting an assessment of the relative potential for specific adverse health effects in selected industries. This type of broad overview is not normally available to the individual occupational health practitioner, and has the potential for improving the practitioner's initial assessment of occupational risk in his or her area of responsibility. Keywords: Populations; Risk; Data source; Data display; Display of estimates; NOES workers exposed; Industry exposure; Industrial chemicals; Calculations
高危人群
工业卫生和毒理学的实践都涉及到对潜在职业健康问题的认识和预测。在预测和(或)识别阶段,对接触某种物剂(化学的、物理的或生物的)对健康或福祉造成的风险进行评估。这一阶段通常包括确定工人已经或可能接触到的病原体;评估药剂的性质,包括毒性;了解使用药剂或与药剂相互作用的条件。这些信息使职业健康和安全专业人员能够根据化学、物理或生物制剂的固有特性,结合在实际使用条件下接触或暴露的可能性,包括环境水平和使用中的暴露控制措施,对职业健康风险进行初步评估。预期/识别过程的两种基本应用可以分为个体应用和群体应用。个人程序由职业健康和安全从业人员使用,他们将预测和识别技术应用于其专业管辖范围内单个设施或一组设施中普遍存在的暴露和暴露条件。在这个过程中,个人专业人员需要了解与这些特定工作场所或过程相关的这些物质的毒性,并了解在这些情况下存在的暴露条件。通过科学文献或在其管辖范围内的工作场所进行调查,从业人员可以获得个别过程所需的数据已有相当长的一段时间了,但历史上可能存在关于商标产品配方的准确信息的例外。更广泛的总体预测和识别过程适用于可定义的工业或职业人群,是对这些人群因在工作场所职业接触化学、物理或生物制剂而对健康产生不利影响的潜在风险的评估。对于职业健康和安全研究人员、监管机构和其他对特定物质或已知有害健康影响的物质清单的暴露程度感兴趣的人来说,综合方法是常用的。例如,在流行病学研究的初始阶段,研究人员可能希望确定暴露于特定病原体或一组病原体的工人群体。政府机构在决定研究或监管工作的优先次序或制定职业健康标准时,需要根据受影响的行业和工人的数量来衡量研究或监管工作的潜在影响。这类数据直到1970年《职业安全与健康法》实施后才得以获得,这需要联邦政府的几项努力。这种确定因职业接触特定个人或群体化学物剂而面临风险的工人群体的综合方法,也为一般职业卫生界提供服务,对可能发生接触的行业进行概况分析,从而能够评估选定行业中特定有害健康影响的相对潜力。这种类型的广泛概述通常不提供给个人职业卫生从业人员,并有可能改善从业人员在他或她的责任领域的职业风险的初步评估。关键词:人口;风险;数据来源;数据显示;估算的显示;NOES工人暴露;行业风险;工业化学物质;计算
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信