External locked plating as the definitive treatment for open proximal tibial fractures-A biomechanical feasibility study

Jung-Ting Wang, Chin-Hsien Wu, Ching-Hou Ma, C. Yen, I. Jou, Y. Tu
{"title":"External locked plating as the definitive treatment for open proximal tibial fractures-A biomechanical feasibility study","authors":"Jung-Ting Wang, Chin-Hsien Wu, Ching-Hou Ma, C. Yen, I. Jou, Y. Tu","doi":"10.6492/FJMD.201802_9(1).0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Open proximal tibial fractures are associated with significant morbidity due to increased risks of infection, nonunion, malunion, knee stiffness, and possible amputation. Several authors demonstrated the benefits of bridging external fixation followed by definitive internal fixation once the soft-tissue envelope had sufficiently healed. We recently demonstrated the benefits of external locked plating followed by definitive internal fixation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical feasibility of definitive external locked plating for open proximal tibial fractures. Methods: Two types of constructs were tested: (1) internal locked plate fixation (ILPF) and (2) external locked plate fixation (ELPF). Specimens were evaluated under static or dynamic axial loading to assess construct stiffness, strength, durability and failure mode. Results: The mean of construct strength of the ILPF and ELPF groups was 2147.4 ± 460.56 N and 793.2 ± 96.78 N, respectively. The mean of construct stiffness of the ILPF and ELPF groups was 384.01 ± 40.37 N/mm and 87.35 ± 7.40 N/mm, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, external locked plating showed biomechanical flexibility and could reduce construct stiffness to promote fracture healing by callus formation. However, ELPF constructs were not as strong as standard locked plating constructs. If we want to use ELPF constructs as definitive treatment, further biomechanical study to improve construct strength is warranted.","PeriodicalId":100551,"journal":{"name":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":"14 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formosan Journal of Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6492/FJMD.201802_9(1).0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Open proximal tibial fractures are associated with significant morbidity due to increased risks of infection, nonunion, malunion, knee stiffness, and possible amputation. Several authors demonstrated the benefits of bridging external fixation followed by definitive internal fixation once the soft-tissue envelope had sufficiently healed. We recently demonstrated the benefits of external locked plating followed by definitive internal fixation. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical feasibility of definitive external locked plating for open proximal tibial fractures. Methods: Two types of constructs were tested: (1) internal locked plate fixation (ILPF) and (2) external locked plate fixation (ELPF). Specimens were evaluated under static or dynamic axial loading to assess construct stiffness, strength, durability and failure mode. Results: The mean of construct strength of the ILPF and ELPF groups was 2147.4 ± 460.56 N and 793.2 ± 96.78 N, respectively. The mean of construct stiffness of the ILPF and ELPF groups was 384.01 ± 40.37 N/mm and 87.35 ± 7.40 N/mm, respectively. Conclusion: In this study, external locked plating showed biomechanical flexibility and could reduce construct stiffness to promote fracture healing by callus formation. However, ELPF constructs were not as strong as standard locked plating constructs. If we want to use ELPF constructs as definitive treatment, further biomechanical study to improve construct strength is warranted.
外锁定钢板作为开放性胫骨近端骨折的最终治疗方法——生物力学可行性研究
背景:胫骨近端开放性骨折由于感染、不愈合、不愈合、膝关节僵硬和可能截肢的风险增加而具有显著的发病率。几位作者证明了当软组织包膜充分愈合后,桥接外固定随后进行明确内固定的益处。我们最近展示了外锁定钢板后明确内固定的好处。目的:本研究的目的是评估胫骨近端开放性骨折明确外锁定钢板的生物力学可行性。方法:测试两种结构:(1)内锁定钢板固定(ILPF)和(2)外锁定钢板固定(ELPF)。试件在静态或动态轴向载荷下进行评估,以评估结构刚度、强度、耐久性和破坏模式。结果:ILPF组和ELPF组的平均构造强度分别为2147.4±460.56 N和793.2±96.78 N。ILPF组和ELPF组的结构刚度平均值分别为384.01±40.37 N/mm和87.35±7.40 N/mm。结论:在本研究中,外锁钢板具有生物力学柔韧性,可降低构造刚度,促进骨痂形成骨折愈合。然而,ELPF结构不像标准锁定镀层结构那样坚固。如果我们想使用ELPF结构作为最终治疗,进一步的生物力学研究来提高结构的强度是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信