An examination of peer recovery support specialist work roles and activities within the recovery ecosystems of Central Appalachia

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Angela Hagaman, Kelly Foster, Morgan Kidd, Rob Pack
{"title":"An examination of peer recovery support specialist work roles and activities within the recovery ecosystems of Central Appalachia","authors":"Angela Hagaman, Kelly Foster, Morgan Kidd, Rob Pack","doi":"10.1080/16066359.2022.2163387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Substance use/misuse is a leading public health concern in the United States. In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, drug-related deaths exceeded 100,000 in a 12-month period for the first time in history. There is currently an urgent need for empirical evidence to inform community leaders and policy makers on the benefits of recovery-informed approaches to SUD prevention and treatment. The peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) is a certified professional who self-identifies as being in recovery from a substance use disorder (SUD), mental illness, or co-occurring disorder and may play an important role in positively affecting outcomes for persons with SUD. However, the evidence for PRSS services is limited in part due to methods that are ill-fitted to measure the dynamic process of recovery across time and within a complex service continuum. Methods This sequential exploratory mixed-methods study queried PRSS in five Central Appalachian states regarding their work roles and activities within the context of regional service networks also known as ‘recovery ecosystems.’ Results 565 Central Appalachian PRSS respondents indicate that they frequently provide emotional support in a broad array of regional service settings but have few professional advancement opportunities. PRSS also report that their role is frequently misunderstood. Conclusions This study expands the existing literature providing information about training, remuneration, job satisfaction, work roles and activities within the context of existing recovery ecosystems. Inclusion of peer recovery support specialist’s perspectives improved measurement of peer service delivery and should be considered when working with this vital recovery-supporting workforce.","PeriodicalId":47851,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Research & Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Research & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2022.2163387","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background Substance use/misuse is a leading public health concern in the United States. In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, drug-related deaths exceeded 100,000 in a 12-month period for the first time in history. There is currently an urgent need for empirical evidence to inform community leaders and policy makers on the benefits of recovery-informed approaches to SUD prevention and treatment. The peer recovery support specialist (PRSS) is a certified professional who self-identifies as being in recovery from a substance use disorder (SUD), mental illness, or co-occurring disorder and may play an important role in positively affecting outcomes for persons with SUD. However, the evidence for PRSS services is limited in part due to methods that are ill-fitted to measure the dynamic process of recovery across time and within a complex service continuum. Methods This sequential exploratory mixed-methods study queried PRSS in five Central Appalachian states regarding their work roles and activities within the context of regional service networks also known as ‘recovery ecosystems.’ Results 565 Central Appalachian PRSS respondents indicate that they frequently provide emotional support in a broad array of regional service settings but have few professional advancement opportunities. PRSS also report that their role is frequently misunderstood. Conclusions This study expands the existing literature providing information about training, remuneration, job satisfaction, work roles and activities within the context of existing recovery ecosystems. Inclusion of peer recovery support specialist’s perspectives improved measurement of peer service delivery and should be considered when working with this vital recovery-supporting workforce.
对阿巴拉契亚中部恢复生态系统内同伴恢复支持专家工作角色和活动的审查
物质使用/滥用是美国主要的公共卫生问题。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,与毒品有关的死亡人数在12个月内首次超过10万人。目前迫切需要经验证据,以告知社区领导人和政策制定者康复知情方法对SUD预防和治疗的好处。同伴康复支持专家(PRSS)是一名经过认证的专业人士,他们自我认定正在从物质使用障碍(SUD)、精神疾病或共患障碍中康复,并可能在积极影响SUD患者的结果方面发挥重要作用。然而,PRSS服务的证据有限,部分原因是由于方法不适合测量跨时间和复杂服务连续体内的动态恢复过程。该顺序探索性混合方法研究询问了阿巴拉契亚中部五个州的PRSS在区域服务网络(也称为“恢复生态系统”)中的工作角色和活动。565名阿巴拉契亚中部地区的PRSS受访者表示,他们经常在广泛的区域服务环境中提供情感支持,但很少有职业发展机会。减贫战略报告还指出,它们的作用经常被误解。本研究扩展了现有文献,提供了在现有恢复生态系统背景下的培训、薪酬、工作满意度、工作角色和活动的信息。纳入同伴恢复支持专家的观点可以改善对同伴服务提供的衡量,在与这些重要的恢复支持工作人员一起工作时应考虑这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.90%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Since being founded in 1993, Addiction Research and Theory has been the leading outlet for research and theoretical contributions that view addictive behaviour as arising from psychological processes within the individual and the social context in which the behaviour takes place as much as from the biological effects of the psychoactive substance or activity involved. This cross-disciplinary journal examines addictive behaviours from a variety of perspectives and methods of inquiry. Disciplines represented in the journal include Anthropology, Economics, Epidemiology, Medicine, Sociology, Psychology and History, but high quality contributions from other relevant areas will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信