Thematic analysis of comments from a survey on perceptions of gender bias among members of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners in bovine practice in the United States

V. Fajt, S. Wagner, M. Apley
{"title":"Thematic analysis of comments from a survey on perceptions of gender bias among members of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners in bovine practice in the United States","authors":"V. Fajt, S. Wagner, M. Apley","doi":"10.21423/bovine-vol55no2p89-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gender composition of food animal practice differsfrom other veterinary practice types, and women are relativelyunderrepresented in food animal practice. The reasonsare unknown, and a possible factor is gender bias. There areno reports specific to bovine practice concerning the extentor perception of gender bias. American Association of BovinePractitioners members in the US were invited to participatein an anonymous online survey regarding gender bias inbovine practice, and thematic analysis was performed on thefree text comments. There were 207 responses (99 womenand 108 men), which included over 1000 comment extractsthat were coded in the thematic analysis. The most commonthemes associated with gender differences in survey commentswere practices not wanting to hire women becauseof lack of strength or stamina, clients asking for the maleveterinarian, and pregnancy- or children-related issues. Theresults of this thematic analysis support the assertion thatgender bias exists in bovine practice in the US.","PeriodicalId":22281,"journal":{"name":"The Bovine practitioner","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bovine practitioner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21423/bovine-vol55no2p89-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The gender composition of food animal practice differsfrom other veterinary practice types, and women are relativelyunderrepresented in food animal practice. The reasonsare unknown, and a possible factor is gender bias. There areno reports specific to bovine practice concerning the extentor perception of gender bias. American Association of BovinePractitioners members in the US were invited to participatein an anonymous online survey regarding gender bias inbovine practice, and thematic analysis was performed on thefree text comments. There were 207 responses (99 womenand 108 men), which included over 1000 comment extractsthat were coded in the thematic analysis. The most commonthemes associated with gender differences in survey commentswere practices not wanting to hire women becauseof lack of strength or stamina, clients asking for the maleveterinarian, and pregnancy- or children-related issues. Theresults of this thematic analysis support the assertion thatgender bias exists in bovine practice in the US.
专题分析了美国牛从业者协会成员对美国牛实践中性别偏见的看法的调查意见
食用动物实践的性别构成与其他兽医实践类型不同,女性在食用动物实践中的代表性相对不足。原因尚不清楚,一个可能的因素是性别偏见。目前还没有关于牛对性别偏见的认知的具体报告。美国牛业从业者协会邀请美国会员参加一项关于牛业性别偏见的匿名在线调查,并对免费文本评论进行专题分析。共有207份回复(99名女性和108名男性),其中包括1000多条评论摘录,这些评论摘录被编码在主题分析中。在调查评论中,与性别差异相关的最常见的主题是,因女性缺乏力量或耐力而不愿雇用女性,客户要求男性兽医,以及与怀孕或孩子有关的问题。这一专题分析的结果支持了性别偏见存在于美国牛实践的断言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信