Clinical Implementation of A Multimodal Analgesia Regimen for Cardiac Surgical Patients

R. Saffary, Cody Parsons, Einar Ottesta, H. Pulley, Corinne Pogemiller, J. Boyd, A. Cheung
{"title":"Clinical Implementation of A Multimodal Analgesia Regimen for Cardiac Surgical Patients","authors":"R. Saffary, Cody Parsons, Einar Ottesta, H. Pulley, Corinne Pogemiller, J. Boyd, A. Cheung","doi":"10.24015/JAPM.2018.0070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim of review: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols that utilize a multimodal, narcotic-sparing approach to pain management have proven to be effective for colorectal and other surgical subspecialties. However, perioperative pain management for cardiac surgical patients remain suboptimal and based primarily on the use of narcotic analgesics that expose patients to potential short- and long-term complications of opioid therapy. The objective of this investigation was to review the existing clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of non-narcotic analgesics for the treatment of postoperative pain to create and implement a perioperative multimodal analgesic regimen that can be integrated into the current pain management practices for patients undergoing cardiothoracic operations. Methods: A multidisciplinary task force consisting of anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, physician assistants, and pharmacists from the cardiovascular health service line was ap-pointed to develop a standard order set in the electronic health record for the treatment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing cardiac operations. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for studies on perioperative pain management after cardiac surgery. The available data were reviewed for quality and relevance to the management of cardiac surgical patients. Once consensus was achieved, an order set was created and univer-sally applied for all cardiac surgical patients admitted to the surgical cardiovascular intensive care unit after the operation. Recent findings: Evidence exists to support the safety and efficacy of a multimodal pain management protocol for cardiac surgical patients in an effort to improve patient satisfaction and comfort while limiting the adverse effects of opioid analgesics. Summary: A multidisciplinary task force achieved consensus in creating an evidence-based, opioid-sparing, multi-modal medication order set for the management of postoperative pain in cardiac surgical patients. The standardized analgesic regimen was compliant with guidelines of The Joint Commission, widely accepted and quickly adopted in clinical use. Continuing investigations will be directed at quantifying whether the multimodal analgesic regimen will improve patient satisfaction, decrease postoperative pain scores, and reduce the incidence of opioid-related adverse events. ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":15018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24015/JAPM.2018.0070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim of review: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols that utilize a multimodal, narcotic-sparing approach to pain management have proven to be effective for colorectal and other surgical subspecialties. However, perioperative pain management for cardiac surgical patients remain suboptimal and based primarily on the use of narcotic analgesics that expose patients to potential short- and long-term complications of opioid therapy. The objective of this investigation was to review the existing clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of non-narcotic analgesics for the treatment of postoperative pain to create and implement a perioperative multimodal analgesic regimen that can be integrated into the current pain management practices for patients undergoing cardiothoracic operations. Methods: A multidisciplinary task force consisting of anesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses, physician assistants, and pharmacists from the cardiovascular health service line was ap-pointed to develop a standard order set in the electronic health record for the treatment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing cardiac operations. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for studies on perioperative pain management after cardiac surgery. The available data were reviewed for quality and relevance to the management of cardiac surgical patients. Once consensus was achieved, an order set was created and univer-sally applied for all cardiac surgical patients admitted to the surgical cardiovascular intensive care unit after the operation. Recent findings: Evidence exists to support the safety and efficacy of a multimodal pain management protocol for cardiac surgical patients in an effort to improve patient satisfaction and comfort while limiting the adverse effects of opioid analgesics. Summary: A multidisciplinary task force achieved consensus in creating an evidence-based, opioid-sparing, multi-modal medication order set for the management of postoperative pain in cardiac surgical patients. The standardized analgesic regimen was compliant with guidelines of The Joint Commission, widely accepted and quickly adopted in clinical use. Continuing investigations will be directed at quantifying whether the multimodal analgesic regimen will improve patient satisfaction, decrease postoperative pain scores, and reduce the incidence of opioid-related adverse events. ABSTRACT
心脏手术患者多模式镇痛方案的临床实施
综述的目的:增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案利用多模式,麻醉性节约的方法来管理疼痛已被证明是有效的结肠直肠和其他外科专科。然而,心脏手术患者围手术期疼痛管理仍然不够理想,主要基于麻醉性镇痛药的使用,这使患者暴露于阿片类药物治疗潜在的短期和长期并发症。本研究的目的是回顾非麻醉性镇痛药治疗术后疼痛的安全性和有效性的现有临床证据,以创建和实施围手术期多模式镇痛方案,该方案可纳入当前心胸手术患者的疼痛管理实践。方法:一个由麻醉师、外科医生、护士、医师助理和来自心血管健康服务线的药剂师组成的多学科工作组旨在为心脏手术患者术后疼痛的治疗制定一套电子健康记录的标准医嘱。在PubMed和Cochrane数据库中搜索心脏手术后围手术期疼痛管理的研究。对现有数据的质量和与心脏外科患者管理的相关性进行了审查。一旦达成共识,就创建一个订单集,并将其普遍应用于所有手术后入住外科心血管重症监护病房的心脏外科患者。最新发现:有证据支持心脏手术患者多模式疼痛管理方案的安全性和有效性,以提高患者满意度和舒适度,同时限制阿片类镇痛药的不良反应。摘要:一个多学科工作组在创建一个以证据为基础的、阿片类药物节约的、多模式的药物处方集来管理心脏手术患者术后疼痛方面达成了共识。标准化的镇痛方案符合联合委员会的指导方针,被广泛接受并迅速应用于临床。持续的研究将旨在量化多模式镇痛方案是否会提高患者满意度,降低术后疼痛评分,并减少阿片类药物相关不良事件的发生率。摘要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信