Geological and geotechnical assessment of natural sands in Ilorin, Nigeria

IF 1.3 Q3 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
O. O. Owoyemi, L. Afolagboye
{"title":"Geological and geotechnical assessment of natural sands in Ilorin, Nigeria","authors":"O. O. Owoyemi, L. Afolagboye","doi":"10.1680/jcoma.22.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of aggregates used in plastering mortar contributes to its quality. This work evaluates the suitability of two grades of sand, sharp sand collected along active/old river courses and plastering sand collected from burrow pits, as plastering materials. X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence analysis were used to access their mineralogy, major, minor, and trace element components. Grain size distribution analysis, natural moisture content, specific gravity, Atterberg limits, matric suction and permeability tests were also carried out on the sand samples. In both sands, silica (SiO2) content was more than 80%. The plastering sand exists at a higher natural moisture content than the sharp sand. The fines modulus ranges from 1.79 to 2.06 and 0.76 to 1.44, respectively, in sharp sand and plastering sand. The permeability coefficients and matric suction of sharp sand are larger than those of plastering sand. This implies that sharp sand will allow easier water passage through its pore spaces, therefore tending to exist in a dryer state than plastering sand. Sharp sand may be suitable for plastering because the test results are within the acceptable limits for good plastering materials according to national and international standards for good plastering sand.","PeriodicalId":51787,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Construction Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jcoma.22.00016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of aggregates used in plastering mortar contributes to its quality. This work evaluates the suitability of two grades of sand, sharp sand collected along active/old river courses and plastering sand collected from burrow pits, as plastering materials. X-ray diffraction and X-ray fluorescence analysis were used to access their mineralogy, major, minor, and trace element components. Grain size distribution analysis, natural moisture content, specific gravity, Atterberg limits, matric suction and permeability tests were also carried out on the sand samples. In both sands, silica (SiO2) content was more than 80%. The plastering sand exists at a higher natural moisture content than the sharp sand. The fines modulus ranges from 1.79 to 2.06 and 0.76 to 1.44, respectively, in sharp sand and plastering sand. The permeability coefficients and matric suction of sharp sand are larger than those of plastering sand. This implies that sharp sand will allow easier water passage through its pore spaces, therefore tending to exist in a dryer state than plastering sand. Sharp sand may be suitable for plastering because the test results are within the acceptable limits for good plastering materials according to national and international standards for good plastering sand.
尼日利亚伊洛林天然砂的地质和岩土工程评价
抹灰砂浆中骨料的质量直接影响抹灰砂浆的质量。这项工作评估了两种等级的砂的适用性,一种是沿着活跃/旧河道收集的尖砂,另一种是从洞穴坑收集的抹灰砂,作为抹灰材料。x射线衍射和x射线荧光分析获得其矿物学,主要,次要和微量元素组成。对砂样进行了粒度分布分析、天然含水率、比重、Atterberg极限、基质吸力和渗透率测试。两种砂中SiO2含量均大于80%。抹灰砂比尖砂具有更高的天然含水率。细粒模量在尖锐砂和抹灰砂中分别为1.79 ~ 2.06和0.76 ~ 1.44。锐砂的渗透系数和基质吸力均大于抹灰砂。这意味着尖砂将允许更容易的水通过其孔隙空间,因此倾向于存在于干燥状态比抹灰砂。锐砂可能适合抹灰,因为根据国家和国际标准,测试结果在良好抹灰材料的可接受范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信