NIETZSCHE, EL SOBREHUMANO Y EL TRANSHUMANISMO

S. Sorgner
{"title":"NIETZSCHE, EL SOBREHUMANO Y EL TRANSHUMANISMO","authors":"S. Sorgner","doi":"10.15359/PRAXIS.75.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bostrom rejects Nietzsche as an ancestor of the transhumanist movement, as he claims that there were merely some “surface-level similarities with the Nietzschean vision” (Bostrom 2005a, 4). In contrast to Bostrom, I think that significant similarities between the posthuman and the overhuman can be found on a fundamental level. In addition, it seems to me that Nietzsche explained the relevance of the overhuman by referring to a dimension which seems to be lacking in transhumanism. In order to explain my position, I will progress as follows. First, I will compare the concept of the posthuman to that of Nietzsche’s overhuman, focusing more on their similarities than their differences. Second, I will contextualise the overhuman in Nietzsche’s general vision, so that I can point out which dimension seems to me to be lacking in transhumanist thought.","PeriodicalId":20367,"journal":{"name":"Praxis Journal of Philosophy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Praxis Journal of Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15359/PRAXIS.75.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bostrom rejects Nietzsche as an ancestor of the transhumanist movement, as he claims that there were merely some “surface-level similarities with the Nietzschean vision” (Bostrom 2005a, 4). In contrast to Bostrom, I think that significant similarities between the posthuman and the overhuman can be found on a fundamental level. In addition, it seems to me that Nietzsche explained the relevance of the overhuman by referring to a dimension which seems to be lacking in transhumanism. In order to explain my position, I will progress as follows. First, I will compare the concept of the posthuman to that of Nietzsche’s overhuman, focusing more on their similarities than their differences. Second, I will contextualise the overhuman in Nietzsche’s general vision, so that I can point out which dimension seems to me to be lacking in transhumanist thought.
尼采,超人和超人类主义
博斯特罗姆拒绝尼采作为超人类主义运动的祖先,因为他声称只有一些“表面上与尼采的愿景相似”(博斯特罗姆2005a, 4)。与博斯特罗姆相反,我认为在基本层面上,后人类和超人类之间可以找到显著的相似之处。此外,在我看来,尼采通过引用超人类主义中似乎缺乏的一个维度来解释超人类的相关性。为了说明我的立场,我将进行如下阐述。首先,我将比较后人类的概念与尼采的超人的概念,更多地关注他们的相似之处而不是他们的不同之处。其次,我将把超人置于尼采的一般视野中,这样我就可以指出在我看来,在超人类主义思想中缺少哪个维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信