Rola adjuwantowego usuwania układu chłonnego szyi po radiochemioterapii w zaawansowanym raku płaskonabłonkowym głowy i szyi – przegląd literatury

Anna Adamska, Anna Rucińska
{"title":"Rola adjuwantowego usuwania układu chłonnego szyi po radiochemioterapii w zaawansowanym raku płaskonabłonkowym głowy i szyi – przegląd literatury","authors":"Anna Adamska,&nbsp;Anna Rucińska","doi":"10.1016/j.onko.2014.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Chemoradiation (CT-RT) is currently a recognised standard of treatment for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. An adjuvant neck node dissection remains a controversial issue. Some authors suggest that surgery should be proposed for all patients with advanced N-stage at diagnosis regardless of the response to organ-preservation protocol which is CT-RT. Others recommend that the decision on surgery should be based on the clinical assessment of the response to radical CT-RT. Both strategies are characterised by a comparable regional control and progression free survival rates. They differ, however, in the quantity and quality of induced complications, and generate different costs. Therefore, an intensive search for (clinical or radiological) predictors to treatment response is needed to identify a specific group of patients who would benefit from adding neck dissection and without exposing complete responders to unnecessary complications. In this respect, the use of PET-CT scanning has gained some interest in selecting patients appropriate for lymphatic surgery. This method, however, has been found to have some faults and limitations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101295,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Naukowe WCO, Letters in Oncology Science","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.onko.2014.03.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Naukowe WCO, Letters in Oncology Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1734048914000030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chemoradiation (CT-RT) is currently a recognised standard of treatment for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. An adjuvant neck node dissection remains a controversial issue. Some authors suggest that surgery should be proposed for all patients with advanced N-stage at diagnosis regardless of the response to organ-preservation protocol which is CT-RT. Others recommend that the decision on surgery should be based on the clinical assessment of the response to radical CT-RT. Both strategies are characterised by a comparable regional control and progression free survival rates. They differ, however, in the quantity and quality of induced complications, and generate different costs. Therefore, an intensive search for (clinical or radiological) predictors to treatment response is needed to identify a specific group of patients who would benefit from adding neck dissection and without exposing complete responders to unnecessary complications. In this respect, the use of PET-CT scanning has gained some interest in selecting patients appropriate for lymphatic surgery. This method, however, has been found to have some faults and limitations.

放化疗(CT-RT)是目前公认的治疗晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌的标准。辅助淋巴结清扫仍然是一个有争议的问题。一些作者建议,对于所有诊断为晚期n期的患者,无论对器官保存方案(CT-RT)的反应如何,都应建议进行手术。其他人建议手术的决定应基于对根治性CT-RT反应的临床评估。这两种策略的特点是相当的区域控制和无进展生存率。然而,它们在诱发并发症的数量和质量上有所不同,并产生不同的费用。因此,需要深入研究(临床或放射学)治疗反应的预测因素,以确定一组特定的患者,他们将受益于增加颈部解剖,而不会暴露完全应答者不必要的并发症。在这方面,使用PET-CT扫描在选择适合淋巴手术的患者方面获得了一些兴趣。然而,人们发现这种方法存在一些缺陷和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信