An ecological discourse analysis of news coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times

Yahong Xue, Qianqiu Xu
{"title":"An ecological discourse analysis of news coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times","authors":"Yahong Xue, Qianqiu Xu","doi":"10.1515/jwl-2021-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic, as a public health emergency of international concern, is the most extensive one to afflict humanity in this century and poses a grave threat to human life and health. Facing this unknown, unexpected and devastating disease, China makes an all-out effort to fight against it shoulder to shoulder with the rest of the world. Based on the ecosophy of “diversity and harmony, interaction and co-existence” and with ecolinguistic appraisal system as the theoretical framework, this study provides an ecological discourse analysis of news coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times, two major Western mainstream media outlets, aiming to reveal the appraisal characteristics and ecological orientations of the news coverage on this public health emergency as well as the attitudes of the two major Western mainstream media outlets concerned towards China’s fight against COVID-19, thus helping people to understand the news discourse on this major public health emergency and in turn to distinguish different media positions. It is found that both news outlets employ more negative appraisal resources to express their attitudes towards China’s fight against COVID-19 and their news coverage is to a greater extent eco-destructive.","PeriodicalId":93793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of world languages","volume":"109 1","pages":"80 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of world languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jwl-2021-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic, as a public health emergency of international concern, is the most extensive one to afflict humanity in this century and poses a grave threat to human life and health. Facing this unknown, unexpected and devastating disease, China makes an all-out effort to fight against it shoulder to shoulder with the rest of the world. Based on the ecosophy of “diversity and harmony, interaction and co-existence” and with ecolinguistic appraisal system as the theoretical framework, this study provides an ecological discourse analysis of news coverage of COVID-19 in China in The Times and The New York Times, two major Western mainstream media outlets, aiming to reveal the appraisal characteristics and ecological orientations of the news coverage on this public health emergency as well as the attitudes of the two major Western mainstream media outlets concerned towards China’s fight against COVID-19, thus helping people to understand the news discourse on this major public health emergency and in turn to distinguish different media positions. It is found that both news outlets employ more negative appraisal resources to express their attitudes towards China’s fight against COVID-19 and their news coverage is to a greater extent eco-destructive.
《纽约时报》和《纽约时报》对中国新冠肺炎新闻报道的生态话语分析
新冠肺炎大流行是本世纪以来影响人类范围最广的突发公共卫生事件,对人类生命和健康构成严重威胁,是国际关注的突发公共卫生事件。面对这种未知、意外、毁灭性的疾病,中国正与世界各国一道,全力抗击疫情。本研究以“多元与和谐、互动与共存”的生态理念为基础,以生态语言学评价体系为理论框架,对西方两大主流媒体《泰晤士报》和《纽约时报》在中国的新冠肺炎新闻报道进行生态话语分析。旨在揭示此次突发公共事件新闻报道的评价特征和生态取向,以及西方两大主流媒体对中国抗击新冠肺炎疫情的态度,从而帮助人们了解此次重大突发公共事件的新闻话语,进而区分不同媒体的立场。研究发现,两家媒体在表达对中国抗击疫情的态度时,都使用了更多的负面评价资源,新闻报道的生态破坏性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信