A New Supplement to Diogenes of Oenoanda’s Fr. 6 Smith: a Case of Epicurean Language Selection

IF 0.1 3区历史学 0 CLASSICS

PHILOLOGUS Pub Date : 2020-10-22 DOI:10.1515/phil-2020-0118

A. Corrado

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper intends to offer a new supplement to a corrupt passage of the Epicurean inscription of Oenoanda. Smith, in the lacuna of Fr. 6, uses the phrasal term πρῶτα σώματα to indicate the atoms. The supplement is not satisfying as it is based solely on evidence drawn from non-Epicurean texts and Lucretius, who writes in Latin and is not always reliable for reconstructing the Epicurean terminology. In this article, I will try to demonstrate that πρῶτα σώματα is in fact a peripatetic – and subsequently stoic – term indicating the elements in general, which has never been used by any Epicurean author for polemical reasons. Finally, I will propose an alternative supplement.

查看原文本刊更多论文

奥伊诺安达第6章史密斯第欧根尼的新补充:以伊壁鸠鲁语言选择为例

摘要本文拟对伊壁鸠鲁学派《奥伊诺安达》碑文中的一段腐败段落作一新的补充。史密斯在第6章的空白中，用πρ ρ ρ τα σώματα这个短语来表示原子。补编并不令人满意，因为它完全基于非伊壁鸠鲁文本和卢克莱修的证据，卢克莱修用拉丁语写作，在重建伊壁鸠鲁术语方面并不总是可靠的。在这篇文章中，我将试图证明πρ ρ ρ τα σώματα实际上是一个游走的——随后是斯多葛的——术语，表示一般的元素，它从未被任何伊壁鸠鲁学派的作者用于争论的原因。最后，我将提出另一种补充。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOLOGUS CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Die Beiträge behandeln Probleme der griechischen und lateinischen Literatur, Geschichtsschreibung, Philosophie, Religionsgeschichte und Linguistik sowie ihrer Rezeption und der Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Ziel der Zeitschrift ist es, einen Beitrag zur Erhellung der geistigen Kultur der Antike und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte zu leisten. "Philologus" is one of the oldest and most respected periodicals in the field of classical studies. Its articles investigate Greek and Roman literature, historiography, philosophy, history of religion, linguistics, and history of science. The journal contributes to reconstructing and understanding ancient intellectual culture and its lasting influence on European civilization.