Comparison of pre-treatment with low -dose midazolam versus low- dose etomidate for prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus and pain at intubation - A randomized controlled study

N. Sharma
{"title":"Comparison of pre-treatment with low -dose midazolam versus low- dose etomidate for prevention of etomidate induced myoclonus and pain at intubation - A randomized controlled study","authors":"N. Sharma","doi":"10.26611/10151915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Etomidate a commonly used induction agent in anesthesia is associated with pain and episodes of myoclonus post induction. This study was designed to evaluate and compare Midazolam and low dose of Etomidate in prevention of these symptoms on injection. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 90 patients allocated to three study groups. Group 1 patients received 0.015 mg/kg of Midazolam i/v diluted to 5 ml in normal saline, Group II received 0.03 mg/kg of Etomidate i/v diluted to 5 ml in normal saline and Group III received 5 ml normal saline intravenously as premedication. Five minutes after receiving the study drugs, patient was preoxygenated with 100% oxygen for 3 min along with anesthesia induction with 0.3 mg/kg etomidate injected intravenously over the period of 20-30 sec. The patients were observed for etomidate induced myoclonus and pain. Results: The incidence of myoclonus in Group II was least with 46.67% having no myoclonus as compared to group I and III where Majority of patients had grade 3 myoclonus (50%; Group I) and (46.67%; Group III). There was statistical difference between the groups in terms of myoclonus grading. Further, there was statistical difference between the groups in pain score with majority of group 1 patients having grade 3 (severe pain = 46.67%) pain and group 3 patients with 43.3% having severe pain. Group 2 on the contrary majorly reported no pain (46.6%). Conclusions: The current study indicated pre induction of etomidate in low dose as an effective strategy in prevention of EIM as compared to Midazolam.","PeriodicalId":18595,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/10151915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Etomidate a commonly used induction agent in anesthesia is associated with pain and episodes of myoclonus post induction. This study was designed to evaluate and compare Midazolam and low dose of Etomidate in prevention of these symptoms on injection. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 90 patients allocated to three study groups. Group 1 patients received 0.015 mg/kg of Midazolam i/v diluted to 5 ml in normal saline, Group II received 0.03 mg/kg of Etomidate i/v diluted to 5 ml in normal saline and Group III received 5 ml normal saline intravenously as premedication. Five minutes after receiving the study drugs, patient was preoxygenated with 100% oxygen for 3 min along with anesthesia induction with 0.3 mg/kg etomidate injected intravenously over the period of 20-30 sec. The patients were observed for etomidate induced myoclonus and pain. Results: The incidence of myoclonus in Group II was least with 46.67% having no myoclonus as compared to group I and III where Majority of patients had grade 3 myoclonus (50%; Group I) and (46.67%; Group III). There was statistical difference between the groups in terms of myoclonus grading. Further, there was statistical difference between the groups in pain score with majority of group 1 patients having grade 3 (severe pain = 46.67%) pain and group 3 patients with 43.3% having severe pain. Group 2 on the contrary majorly reported no pain (46.6%). Conclusions: The current study indicated pre induction of etomidate in low dose as an effective strategy in prevention of EIM as compared to Midazolam.
低剂量咪达唑仑和低剂量依托咪酯治疗前预防依托咪酯诱导的肌阵挛和插管疼痛的比较——一项随机对照研究
背景:依托咪酯是麻醉中常用的诱导剂,与诱导后疼痛和肌阵挛发作有关。本研究旨在评价和比较咪达唑仑和低剂量依托咪酯在注射时预防这些症状的作用。方法:本前瞻性随机对照研究将90例患者分为三个研究组。组1患者给予0.015 mg/kg咪达唑仑i/v稀释至5 ml生理盐水,组2患者给予0.03 mg/kg依托咪酯i/v稀释至5 ml生理盐水,组3患者给予生理盐水5 ml静脉滴注。给药后5分钟,100%氧预充氧3 min,同时静脉注射依托咪酯0.3 mg/kg麻醉诱导,持续20-30秒。观察患者是否因依托咪酯引起肌挛和疼痛。结果:与I组和III组相比,II组肌阵挛的发生率最低,46.67%的患者无肌阵挛,而I组和III组大多数患者为3级肌阵挛(50%;第一组)和(46.67%;组间肌阵挛分级差异有统计学意义。组间疼痛评分差异有统计学意义,1组患者以3级疼痛为主(重度疼痛46.67%),3组患者以重度疼痛为主(43.3%)。第二组患者无疼痛(46.6%)。结论:目前的研究表明,与咪达唑仑相比,低剂量依托咪酯是预防EIM的有效策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信