Differentiating border-zone tissue from post-infarct scar using ripple mapping during VT ablation

D. Khanra, P. Calvert, P. Wright, S. Hughes, S. Mahida, M. Hall, D. Todd, D. Gupta, V. Luther
{"title":"Differentiating border-zone tissue from post-infarct scar using ripple mapping during VT ablation","authors":"D. Khanra, P. Calvert, P. Wright, S. Hughes, S. Mahida, M. Hall, D. Todd, D. Gupta, V. Luther","doi":"10.1093/europace/euac053.352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n \n \n \n Areas of post-infarct ventricular scar and border-zone slow conduction are often highlighted on a bipolar voltage map with generalized values 0.5mV–1.5mV. The true voltage that differentiates regions of conducting from non-conducting tissue is unknown. Ripple Mapping (RM)displays allows conducting tissue to be seen as areas supporting Ripple activation, and non-conducting tissue as areas devoid of Ripple activation.\n \n \n \n We describe application of Ripple Maps to differentiate areas of scar from conducting tissue during ischemic VT ablation.\n \n \n \n Dense bipolar voltage maps were created (Pentaray catheter, pacing 80-100bpm) and presented as a single value (e.g. 0.5mV-0.5mV) to binarize the color display (red and purple). RMs were superimposed on the voltage map and played above a pre-set noise threshold (>0.05mV). The voltage map mV limit was sequentially reduced (\"border-zone threshold\") until only those areas devoid of Ripple bars appeared red. The surrounding border-zone supporting ripple activation thus appeared purple. We performed off-line analysis of border-zone voltage thresholds from a series of RM guided VT ablations.\n \n \n \n 10 consecutive patients (LVEF 32.3±7.5%) with remote myocardial infarction underwent VT ablation (median 19days (IQR 8-33) since last VT). Bipolar voltage mapping (5873±2841 points, median shell area 224cm2), revealed voltages<0.5mV covered a median 11% (IQR 7-17%) of the shell. The border-zone voltage threshold was median 0.2mV (range 0.12mV - 0.3mV). Non-conducting tissue below this value covered only median 5% (IQR 3-7%) of the entire shell. VT was mappable in 4 patients, and the isthmus was bordered by tissue below the same border-zone threshold as found in normal rhythm. The border-zone was homogenized with ablation(40-50W, median 29 mins (IQR 22-33), and clinical VT was non-inducible in all, and 9 pts (91%) remain sustained VT-free at median 90-day follow-up (IQR 23-139), 2-weeks blanking period).\n Picture 1 presents an infero-lateral LV infarct collected in an RV paced rhythm (7340points) and displayed at conventional bipolar voltage settings 0.5-1.5mV. Tissue with voltages<0.5mV appear red and cover 30% of the total area. In this case, this border-zone voltage threshold was defined as 0.25mV. Non-conducting tissue, seen as areas devoid of ripple bars below this value, now appeared as red, and covered only 11% of the total area. Picture 2 demonstrates the morphologies of 4 poorly tolerated induced VTs during this case. Each had near perfect pacemaps to the exit sites of border-zone tissue defined using this approach, and were targets for ablation resulting in complete non-inducibility and no VT recurrence in early follow-up.\n \n \n \n The bipolar voltage that differentiates putative scar from bordering conducting tissue is unique to each patient, and far lower than 0.5mV-1.5mV. RM presents a practical approach to visualize the border-zone activation to guide ablation.\n","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euac053.352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Type of funding sources: None. Areas of post-infarct ventricular scar and border-zone slow conduction are often highlighted on a bipolar voltage map with generalized values 0.5mV–1.5mV. The true voltage that differentiates regions of conducting from non-conducting tissue is unknown. Ripple Mapping (RM)displays allows conducting tissue to be seen as areas supporting Ripple activation, and non-conducting tissue as areas devoid of Ripple activation. We describe application of Ripple Maps to differentiate areas of scar from conducting tissue during ischemic VT ablation. Dense bipolar voltage maps were created (Pentaray catheter, pacing 80-100bpm) and presented as a single value (e.g. 0.5mV-0.5mV) to binarize the color display (red and purple). RMs were superimposed on the voltage map and played above a pre-set noise threshold (>0.05mV). The voltage map mV limit was sequentially reduced ("border-zone threshold") until only those areas devoid of Ripple bars appeared red. The surrounding border-zone supporting ripple activation thus appeared purple. We performed off-line analysis of border-zone voltage thresholds from a series of RM guided VT ablations. 10 consecutive patients (LVEF 32.3±7.5%) with remote myocardial infarction underwent VT ablation (median 19days (IQR 8-33) since last VT). Bipolar voltage mapping (5873±2841 points, median shell area 224cm2), revealed voltages<0.5mV covered a median 11% (IQR 7-17%) of the shell. The border-zone voltage threshold was median 0.2mV (range 0.12mV - 0.3mV). Non-conducting tissue below this value covered only median 5% (IQR 3-7%) of the entire shell. VT was mappable in 4 patients, and the isthmus was bordered by tissue below the same border-zone threshold as found in normal rhythm. The border-zone was homogenized with ablation(40-50W, median 29 mins (IQR 22-33), and clinical VT was non-inducible in all, and 9 pts (91%) remain sustained VT-free at median 90-day follow-up (IQR 23-139), 2-weeks blanking period). Picture 1 presents an infero-lateral LV infarct collected in an RV paced rhythm (7340points) and displayed at conventional bipolar voltage settings 0.5-1.5mV. Tissue with voltages<0.5mV appear red and cover 30% of the total area. In this case, this border-zone voltage threshold was defined as 0.25mV. Non-conducting tissue, seen as areas devoid of ripple bars below this value, now appeared as red, and covered only 11% of the total area. Picture 2 demonstrates the morphologies of 4 poorly tolerated induced VTs during this case. Each had near perfect pacemaps to the exit sites of border-zone tissue defined using this approach, and were targets for ablation resulting in complete non-inducibility and no VT recurrence in early follow-up. The bipolar voltage that differentiates putative scar from bordering conducting tissue is unique to each patient, and far lower than 0.5mV-1.5mV. RM presents a practical approach to visualize the border-zone activation to guide ablation.
VT消融术中应用纹波成像鉴别梗死后瘢痕与边界区组织
资金来源类型:无。梗死后心室瘢痕区和边界区慢传导常在双极电压图上突出显示,其广义值为0.5mV-1.5mV。区分导电组织和非导电组织的真正电压是未知的。纹波映射(RM)显示允许导电组织被视为支持纹波激活的区域,而非导电组织被视为没有纹波激活的区域。我们描述了应用纹波图来区分区域疤痕从传导组织在缺血性房室消融。创建密集的双极电压图(Pentaray导管,起搏80-100bpm),并以单一值(例如0.5mV-0.5mV)呈现,以二值化颜色显示(红色和紫色)。有效值叠加在电压图上,并在预设的噪声阈值(>0.05mV)之上播放。电压图mV限值依次降低(“边界区阈值”),直到只有那些没有纹波条的区域出现红色。因此,支持波纹激活的周围边界区域呈现紫色。我们对一系列RM引导的VT消融的边界区电压阈值进行了离线分析。连续10例远端心肌梗死患者(LVEF 32.3±7.5%)行房室消融术(中位19天(IQR 8-33))。双极电压映射(5873±2841点,中位壳体面积224cm2)显示,电压<0.5mV覆盖了中位壳体的11% (IQR 7-17%)。边界区电压阈值中位数为0.2mV(范围0.12mV - 0.3mV)。低于此值的非导电组织仅覆盖整个外壳的中位数5% (IQR 3-7%)。4例患者有室速,峡部边界组织低于正常心律的边界区阈值。消融使边界区均匀化(40-50W,中位时间29分钟(IQR 22-33),所有患者均无临床室速,9例(91%)患者在中位90天随访(IQR 23-139), 2周空白期时仍持续无室速。图1显示左室下外侧梗死,以左室节律(7340点)采集,在常规双极电压设置0.5-1.5mV下显示。电压<0.5mV的组织呈红色,占总面积的30%。在这种情况下,边界区电压阈值定义为0.25mV。在此值以下没有波纹条的非导电组织现在显示为红色,仅占总面积的11%。图2显示了本病例中4例耐受性差的诱发静脉血栓的形态学。使用该方法确定的边界区组织的出口部位都有接近完美的起搏图,并且是消融的目标,在早期随访中完全不可诱导且没有室性心动过速复发。区分疤痕和边缘导电组织的双极电压对每个患者来说都是独一无二的,远低于0.5mV-1.5mV。RM提供了一种实用的方法来可视化边界区激活来指导消融。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信