{"title":"How do consumers evaluate products in virtual reality? A literature review for a research agenda","authors":"Generoso Branca, Vittoria Marino, R. Resciniti","doi":"10.1108/sjme-07-2022-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis paper aims to review the existing literature about consumers’ evaluation of products in virtual reality (VR), provide an accurate overview of this field, systematise the knowledge developed so far, identify the research gaps and propose a future research agenda.\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA systematic literature review was performed on Scopus and Web of Science, resulting in a final pool of 31 articles.\n\nFindings\nFour main themes were identified, and a detailed research agenda is proposed based on the findings and following the theory, context, characteristics, methodology framework.\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe provision of formal inclusion and exclusion criteria may have resulted in additional potentially relevant articles not indexed in the data set under consideration.\n\nOriginality/value\nThe paper highlights how products are perceived in VR, the consumers’ responses, the peculiarities of VR compared to other conditions and VR as a product test environment. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper seems to represent the first systemic review that focusses solely on how consumers assess products in VR. The results lead to a broad proposal of directions for future research that can expand knowledge on VR in marketing. Practical implications concern the use of VR to design product strategies and as a testing and prototyping environment.\n","PeriodicalId":37428,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sjme-07-2022-0153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to review the existing literature about consumers’ evaluation of products in virtual reality (VR), provide an accurate overview of this field, systematise the knowledge developed so far, identify the research gaps and propose a future research agenda.
Design/methodology/approach
A systematic literature review was performed on Scopus and Web of Science, resulting in a final pool of 31 articles.
Findings
Four main themes were identified, and a detailed research agenda is proposed based on the findings and following the theory, context, characteristics, methodology framework.
Research limitations/implications
The provision of formal inclusion and exclusion criteria may have resulted in additional potentially relevant articles not indexed in the data set under consideration.
Originality/value
The paper highlights how products are perceived in VR, the consumers’ responses, the peculiarities of VR compared to other conditions and VR as a product test environment. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper seems to represent the first systemic review that focusses solely on how consumers assess products in VR. The results lead to a broad proposal of directions for future research that can expand knowledge on VR in marketing. Practical implications concern the use of VR to design product strategies and as a testing and prototyping environment.
本文旨在回顾关于虚拟现实(VR)中消费者对产品评价的现有文献,提供该领域的准确概述,系统化迄今为止发展的知识,确定研究差距并提出未来的研究议程。设计/方法/方法在Scopus和Web of Science上进行了系统的文献综述,最终得到31篇文章。研究结果确定了四个主题,并根据研究结果和理论、背景、特征、方法框架提出了详细的研究议程。研究限制/影响提供正式的纳入和排除标准可能会导致在考虑的数据集中没有索引的其他潜在相关文章。本文重点介绍了产品在VR中的感知方式、消费者的反应、VR与其他条件相比的独特性以及VR作为产品测试环境。据作者所知,这篇论文似乎是第一个只关注消费者如何评估VR产品的系统综述。研究结果为未来的研究方向提出了广泛的建议,可以扩大VR在营销中的知识。实际意义涉及使用VR来设计产品策略,并作为测试和原型环境。
期刊介绍:
Expected manuscript profile: SJM-ESIC is especially interested in submissions that include unique and novel contributions on the frontier of knowledge, focused on emerging areas relevant to academic research in marketing or even opening new research niches. New methodologies and techniques are particularly appreciated. SJM-ESIC welcomes a wide array of original contributions (quantitative or qualitative empirical analysis, critical literature reviews, meta-analysis, theoretical papers, agenda for future research, etc.), as well as research that cross the frontiers between marketing and other related areas. Submitted manuscripts can be focused on Spanish, Latin-American, but also any other relevant market. Agenda for Future Research: Considering the interest of the SJM-ESIC for unique and novel contributions on the frontier of knowledge, this section aims to create a space for critical reflection of new directions in which future specialized research in the marketing field should advance. The Agenda for Future Research section welcomes contributions outlining emerging opportunities in the marketing discipline derived, for example, from changes in consumers'' behaviour. New challenges in this evolving field might be also addressed. In sum, this section aims to propose new research avenues for marketing academics in order to inspire future research agendas. Leading researchers in the marketing discipline, either alone or in collaboration, are highly encouraged to contribute to this Agenda for Future Research section. Due to the particularities of this type of contributions, no restrictions on manuscript structure apply.