The Role of Turbomachinery in Enabling the Hydrogen Economy

S. Corbò, Tommaso Wolfler, Nicola Banchi, Ippolito Furgiuele, M. Farooq
{"title":"The Role of Turbomachinery in Enabling the Hydrogen Economy","authors":"S. Corbò, Tommaso Wolfler, Nicola Banchi, Ippolito Furgiuele, M. Farooq","doi":"10.2118/207312-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this paper is to present the various technological solutions optimized for the use of hydrogen, in transport, distribution, storage and utilization, analyzing their criticalities and advantages. Hydrogen compression is a fundamental step in the transportation and storage segments and continuous improvement are required. The greatest technological challenges are certainly the high pressures required for the various fields of use, the need to maintain a clean gas and to use materials that are not subject to embrittlement. The choice between the different compression technologies is based on the need for pressures and flow rates; in the case of high flow rates and low compression ratios a centrifugal compressor is preferable, while for low flow rates and high compression ratios the choice goes to piston compressors.\n To prevent gas contamination, dry reciprocating compressor are preferred because they allow to avoid an oil separator filter on the discharge. Current technology of reciprocating compressors allows to compress hydrogen up to 300 bar with lubricated machines, while with dry technology it is possible to reach up to 250 bar. A second criticality on reciprocating compressors is maintenance: the parts subject to wear need to be serviced every 8000 hour of operation. The use of innovative materials will increase the maintenance intervals reaching higher pressures without lubrication.\n To increase the pressure ratio with centrifugal compressor, it's needed to increase the rotating speed, therefore the peripheral speed, with materials suitable for H2, stages get high compression to reduce the number of compressor bodies.\n If the process conditions require high delivery pressures combined with large flow rates, a solution of centrifugal compressors alone would be able to manage the flow rate but not the required delivery pressure. On the other hand, the use of reciprocating compressors would require a considerable number of units. In this case, therefore, the optimal solution is to combine the two technologies, centrifugal and pistons, using the best features.\n A case study in which the superior performances of the hybrid solution in terms of total cost of ownership will be described and compared with traditional single technology compression train","PeriodicalId":10967,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, November 15, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207312-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the various technological solutions optimized for the use of hydrogen, in transport, distribution, storage and utilization, analyzing their criticalities and advantages. Hydrogen compression is a fundamental step in the transportation and storage segments and continuous improvement are required. The greatest technological challenges are certainly the high pressures required for the various fields of use, the need to maintain a clean gas and to use materials that are not subject to embrittlement. The choice between the different compression technologies is based on the need for pressures and flow rates; in the case of high flow rates and low compression ratios a centrifugal compressor is preferable, while for low flow rates and high compression ratios the choice goes to piston compressors. To prevent gas contamination, dry reciprocating compressor are preferred because they allow to avoid an oil separator filter on the discharge. Current technology of reciprocating compressors allows to compress hydrogen up to 300 bar with lubricated machines, while with dry technology it is possible to reach up to 250 bar. A second criticality on reciprocating compressors is maintenance: the parts subject to wear need to be serviced every 8000 hour of operation. The use of innovative materials will increase the maintenance intervals reaching higher pressures without lubrication. To increase the pressure ratio with centrifugal compressor, it's needed to increase the rotating speed, therefore the peripheral speed, with materials suitable for H2, stages get high compression to reduce the number of compressor bodies. If the process conditions require high delivery pressures combined with large flow rates, a solution of centrifugal compressors alone would be able to manage the flow rate but not the required delivery pressure. On the other hand, the use of reciprocating compressors would require a considerable number of units. In this case, therefore, the optimal solution is to combine the two technologies, centrifugal and pistons, using the best features. A case study in which the superior performances of the hybrid solution in terms of total cost of ownership will be described and compared with traditional single technology compression train
涡轮机械在实现氢经济中的作用
本文的目的是提出各种技术解决方案,优化氢的使用,在运输,分配,储存和利用,分析其重要性和优势。氢气压缩是运输和储存环节的基本步骤,需要不断改进。最大的技术挑战当然是各种使用领域所需的高压,保持清洁气体的需要以及使用不易脆化的材料。不同的压缩技术之间的选择是基于压力和流量的需要;在高流量和低压缩比的情况下,离心式压缩机是可取的,而在低流量和高压缩比的情况下,选择活塞压缩机。为了防止气体污染,首选干式往复式压缩机,因为它们可以避免油分离器过滤器上的排放。目前的往复式压缩机技术允许将氢气压缩到300巴的润滑机器,而干燥技术可以达到250巴。往复式压缩机的第二个关键是维护:每运行8000小时,需要对易磨损的部件进行维修。创新材料的使用将增加维修间隔,达到更高的压力而无需润滑。为了提高与离心式压缩机的压比,需要提高转速,因此外围转速,选用适合H2的材料,得到高的压缩,以减少压缩机体的数量。如果工艺条件需要高输送压力和大流量,单独使用离心压缩机的解决方案将能够控制流量,但不能控制所需的输送压力。另一方面,使用往复式压缩机将需要相当数量的机组。因此,在这种情况下,最佳的解决方案是结合两种技术,离心和活塞,利用最好的特点。在一个案例研究中,混合解决方案在总拥有成本方面的优越性能将被描述并与传统的单一技术压缩列车进行比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信