Disaster recovery processes: Analysing the interplay between communities and authorities in Chennai, India

Jonas Joerin , Franziska Steinberger , Ramasamy R. Krishnamurthy , Anna Scolobig
{"title":"Disaster recovery processes: Analysing the interplay between communities and authorities in Chennai, India","authors":"Jonas Joerin ,&nbsp;Franziska Steinberger ,&nbsp;Ramasamy R. Krishnamurthy ,&nbsp;Anna Scolobig","doi":"10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper analyses the underlying factors of a disaster ‘recovery process’. Based on a household survey, conducted ten months after the 2015 South Indian floods in two affected constituencies (Mylapore and Velachery) of Chennai, residents were asked how long they took to recover from the floods and whether they took actively part in the recovery process. The results highlight that residents from the more affected constituency (Velachery) took significantly longer to restore physical aspects (e.g. energy, water, roads, etc.), but only partially longer for social and economic aspects. Aspects of social capital (leadership, communication, ownership and trust) were rated equally low in both communities. However, individual actions to help others or participate in volunteer groups increased more significantly in the constituency that was more affected. The findings from this case study point-out that flood disaster events trigger residents to become more solidary and active to help others, but have little impact on triggering a more active interplay between communities and authorities. This highlights that flood disaster events do not change inherent structural and institutional relationships between key actors (local government, communities, private sector, academia and NGOs) involved in disaster recovery processes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20470,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.083","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705818301012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This paper analyses the underlying factors of a disaster ‘recovery process’. Based on a household survey, conducted ten months after the 2015 South Indian floods in two affected constituencies (Mylapore and Velachery) of Chennai, residents were asked how long they took to recover from the floods and whether they took actively part in the recovery process. The results highlight that residents from the more affected constituency (Velachery) took significantly longer to restore physical aspects (e.g. energy, water, roads, etc.), but only partially longer for social and economic aspects. Aspects of social capital (leadership, communication, ownership and trust) were rated equally low in both communities. However, individual actions to help others or participate in volunteer groups increased more significantly in the constituency that was more affected. The findings from this case study point-out that flood disaster events trigger residents to become more solidary and active to help others, but have little impact on triggering a more active interplay between communities and authorities. This highlights that flood disaster events do not change inherent structural and institutional relationships between key actors (local government, communities, private sector, academia and NGOs) involved in disaster recovery processes.

灾难恢复过程:分析印度金奈社区和当局之间的相互作用
本文分析了灾难“恢复过程”的潜在因素。2015年南印度金奈两个受洪灾影响的选区(Mylapore和Velachery)发生洪灾10个月后,根据一项家庭调查,居民们被问及从洪灾中恢复需要多长时间,以及他们是否积极参与了恢复过程。结果突出表明,受影响更严重的选区(Velachery)的居民恢复物理方面(如能源、水、道路等)所需的时间明显更长,但恢复社会和经济方面所需的时间只有部分更长。在社会资本方面(领导力、沟通、所有权和信任),两个社区的得分都同样低。然而,在受影响更大的选区,帮助他人或参加志愿者团体的个人行为增加得更明显。本案例研究的结果指出,洪水灾害事件促使居民变得更加团结和积极地帮助他人,但对引发社区和当局之间更积极的相互作用几乎没有影响。这突出表明,洪水灾害事件不会改变参与灾害恢复过程的关键行动者(地方政府、社区、私营部门、学术界和非政府组织)之间固有的结构和体制关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信