Dyslipoproteinemia therapy with lipoprotein-apheresis and/or human monoclonal antibodies

R. Bambauer, R. Schiel
{"title":"Dyslipoproteinemia therapy with lipoprotein-apheresis and/or human monoclonal antibodies","authors":"R. Bambauer, R. Schiel","doi":"10.15761/TIM.1000182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prognosis of patients suffering from severe dyslipoproteinemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), and coronary artery disease (CAD) refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs has been improved by the introduction of the lipoprotein-apheresis, and the human monoclonal antibodies (HMA) in different studies. All severe forms of dyslipoproteinemia can be treated successfully with these methods alone or in combination. Different lipoprotein-apheresis systems are available which reduce LDL cholesterol, Lp(a), triglycerides and others: cascade filtration or lipoproteinfiltration, immunoadsorption, heparin-induced LDL precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption, LDL hemoperfusion, and/or different HMA. There is a strong correlation between dyslipoproteinemia and atherosclerosis. Besides the elimination of other risk factors in severe dyslipoproteinemia therapeutic strategies focus on a drastic reduction of serum lipoproteins. In such patients in whom the maximum drug therapy failed, lipoprotein-apheresis (LA) is indicated. Technical and clinical aspects of these different lipoproteinapheresis methods and results of the application of HMA are shown here. The published data clearly demonstrate that treatment with lipoprotein-apheresis in patients suffering from severe dyslipoproteinemia refractory to conservative therapy are effective and safe in long application. A disadvantage is the high costs and the expensive technologies of the different lipoprotein-apheresis methods. The costs of the therapy with HMA are lower than the costs of the lipoprotein-apheresis but larger studies are necessary to show what method could be preferred. *Correspondence to: Rolf Bambauer, MD, PhD, Frankenstrasse 4, 66424 Homburg, Germany, Tel: 0049/(0)6841/68500; Fax: 0049/(0)6841/68561; E-mail: rolf.bambauer@t-online.de","PeriodicalId":23337,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15761/TIM.1000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prognosis of patients suffering from severe dyslipoproteinemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), and coronary artery disease (CAD) refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs has been improved by the introduction of the lipoprotein-apheresis, and the human monoclonal antibodies (HMA) in different studies. All severe forms of dyslipoproteinemia can be treated successfully with these methods alone or in combination. Different lipoprotein-apheresis systems are available which reduce LDL cholesterol, Lp(a), triglycerides and others: cascade filtration or lipoproteinfiltration, immunoadsorption, heparin-induced LDL precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption, LDL hemoperfusion, and/or different HMA. There is a strong correlation between dyslipoproteinemia and atherosclerosis. Besides the elimination of other risk factors in severe dyslipoproteinemia therapeutic strategies focus on a drastic reduction of serum lipoproteins. In such patients in whom the maximum drug therapy failed, lipoprotein-apheresis (LA) is indicated. Technical and clinical aspects of these different lipoproteinapheresis methods and results of the application of HMA are shown here. The published data clearly demonstrate that treatment with lipoprotein-apheresis in patients suffering from severe dyslipoproteinemia refractory to conservative therapy are effective and safe in long application. A disadvantage is the high costs and the expensive technologies of the different lipoprotein-apheresis methods. The costs of the therapy with HMA are lower than the costs of the lipoprotein-apheresis but larger studies are necessary to show what method could be preferred. *Correspondence to: Rolf Bambauer, MD, PhD, Frankenstrasse 4, 66424 Homburg, Germany, Tel: 0049/(0)6841/68500; Fax: 0049/(0)6841/68561; E-mail: rolf.bambauer@t-online.de
用脂蛋白分离和/或人单克隆抗体治疗脂蛋白异常血症
严重脂蛋白异常血症(有时合并脂蛋白(a) (Lp(a))升高,以及饮食和降脂药物难以治疗的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的预后已通过脂蛋白分离术的引入和不同研究中的人单克隆抗体(HMA)得到改善。所有严重形式的脂蛋白异常血症都可以单独或联合使用这些方法成功治疗。不同的脂蛋白分离系统可用于降低LDL胆固醇,Lp(a),甘油三酯和其他:级联过滤或脂蛋白浸润,免疫吸附,肝素诱导的LDL沉淀,葡聚糖硫酸盐LDL吸附,LDL血液灌流和/或不同的HMA。脂蛋白异常血症与动脉粥样硬化之间有很强的相关性。除了消除严重脂蛋白异常血症的其他危险因素外,治疗策略的重点是大幅降低血清脂蛋白。在这些最大药物治疗失败的患者中,需要脂蛋白分离(LA)。这些不同的脂蛋白分离方法的技术和临床方面以及HMA应用的结果显示在这里。已发表的数据清楚地表明,在保守治疗难治性严重脂蛋白异常血症患者中,长期应用脂蛋白分离治疗是有效和安全的。不同的脂蛋白分离方法的缺点是成本高,技术昂贵。HMA治疗的成本低于脂蛋白分离的成本,但需要更大规模的研究来证明哪种方法更可取。*通讯:Rolf Bambauer, MD, PhD, Frankenstrasse 4, 66424 Homburg, Germany, Tel: 0049/(0)6841/68500;传真:0049 / (0)6841/68561;电子邮件:rolf.bambauer@t-online.de
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信