{"title":"Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Mental Health Status Prevailing among COVID-19 Patients in Mumbai, India.","authors":"Arjun Gurmeet Singh, Hitesh Singhavi, Florida Sharin, Muffazal Lakdawala, Sharayu Mhatre, Jayita Deodhar, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Rajesh Dikshit","doi":"10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_928_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim was to determine the prevalence and predictors of depression among less symptomatic COVID-19 patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire-based assessment was conducted among asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients when admitted in a COVID-19 facility (T1) and after 6 months (T2). Interviews were conducted using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 instrument. Socio-demographic details and length of facility stay were recorded. Changes in scores between the two-time points T1 and T2 were compared. Factors predicting depression were determined using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test during facility stay, and those predicting worsening over time were obtained using multivariate regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 91.4% (<i>n</i> = 450) participants, prevalence of depression was 38.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 34.0-43.0) with a significant increase of 7.8-fold (95% CI = 4.8-12.8) in depression as the duration of stay increased beyond a median of 5 days. A significant association was observed between higher income and lower depression (odds ratios = 0.6, <i>P</i> = 0.03). 84% (<i>n</i> = 378) responded at the second timepoint assessment after a median of 6.62 months (T2). There was a significant difference observed between the 2.6% (<i>n</i> = 6) that worsened into depression at T2 and the 73.8% (<i>n</i> = 107) that improved out of depression at T2 (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.001). Age >45 years (<i>P</i> = 0.007), males (<i>P</i> = 0.011) and reinfection (<i>P</i> = 0.039) significantly led to worsening of depression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for actively detecting and managing depression in institutionally quarantined survivors, considering limiting such quarantine to no more than a week, and providing routine screening and care for depression beyond this period.</p>","PeriodicalId":43156,"journal":{"name":"HENRY JAMES REVIEW","volume":"13 1","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8971876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HENRY JAMES REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijcm.ijcm_928_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The aim was to determine the prevalence and predictors of depression among less symptomatic COVID-19 patients.
Methods: A questionnaire-based assessment was conducted among asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic COVID-19 patients when admitted in a COVID-19 facility (T1) and after 6 months (T2). Interviews were conducted using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 instrument. Socio-demographic details and length of facility stay were recorded. Changes in scores between the two-time points T1 and T2 were compared. Factors predicting depression were determined using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test during facility stay, and those predicting worsening over time were obtained using multivariate regression models.
Results: Among the 91.4% (n = 450) participants, prevalence of depression was 38.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 34.0-43.0) with a significant increase of 7.8-fold (95% CI = 4.8-12.8) in depression as the duration of stay increased beyond a median of 5 days. A significant association was observed between higher income and lower depression (odds ratios = 0.6, P = 0.03). 84% (n = 378) responded at the second timepoint assessment after a median of 6.62 months (T2). There was a significant difference observed between the 2.6% (n = 6) that worsened into depression at T2 and the 73.8% (n = 107) that improved out of depression at T2 (P ≤ 0.001). Age >45 years (P = 0.007), males (P = 0.011) and reinfection (P = 0.039) significantly led to worsening of depression.
Conclusion: There is a need for actively detecting and managing depression in institutionally quarantined survivors, considering limiting such quarantine to no more than a week, and providing routine screening and care for depression beyond this period.