{"title":"Evaluation of Second Generation Antipsychotics, as Augmentative Plan, in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder","authors":"S. Shafti, H. Kaviani","doi":"10.2174/2211556008666190314113446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSince around half of the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder\ndo not respond efficiently to current serotonin- reuptake inhibitors, the objective of\nthe present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of quetiapine against aripiprazole\nin patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded successfully\nto fluvoxamine.\n\n\n\nForty-four patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded\nefficaciously to fluvoxamine, at maximum dose (300 milligrams per day) and duration\n(twelve weeks), were allocated randomly in a double-blind assessment to take quetiapine\n(n=22) or aripiprazole (n=22), plus their serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for twelve weeks.\nWhile treatment response was evaluated by the Yale- Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale\n(YBOCS), as the main outcome scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale (CGI-S)\nwas also used as an ancillary measure.\n\n\n\n54.54% of patients in the quetiapine group and 27.27% of them in the aripiprazole\ngroup responded partially to the abovementioned on treatment adds. According to the findings,\nthe YBOCS score dropped from 31.18+/-4.93 to 27.97+/-3.71 (p<0.01), and 33.27 +/- 3.90\nto 30.72+/-4.67 (p < 0.06), for quetiapine and aripiprazole, respectively. In this regard, no\nsubstantial alteration regarding CGI-S was evident in each of the aforementioned groups.\n\n\n\nThis assessment indicated that patients with treatment-resistant obsessivecompulsive\ndisorder could benefit more from adding quetiapine, in comparison with aripiprazole,\nto their current serotonergic medication.\n","PeriodicalId":10751,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychopharmacology","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2211556008666190314113446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Since around half of the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder
do not respond efficiently to current serotonin- reuptake inhibitors, the objective of
the present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of quetiapine against aripiprazole
in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded successfully
to fluvoxamine.
Forty-four patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded
efficaciously to fluvoxamine, at maximum dose (300 milligrams per day) and duration
(twelve weeks), were allocated randomly in a double-blind assessment to take quetiapine
(n=22) or aripiprazole (n=22), plus their serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for twelve weeks.
While treatment response was evaluated by the Yale- Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale
(YBOCS), as the main outcome scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale (CGI-S)
was also used as an ancillary measure.
54.54% of patients in the quetiapine group and 27.27% of them in the aripiprazole
group responded partially to the abovementioned on treatment adds. According to the findings,
the YBOCS score dropped from 31.18+/-4.93 to 27.97+/-3.71 (p<0.01), and 33.27 +/- 3.90
to 30.72+/-4.67 (p < 0.06), for quetiapine and aripiprazole, respectively. In this regard, no
substantial alteration regarding CGI-S was evident in each of the aforementioned groups.
This assessment indicated that patients with treatment-resistant obsessivecompulsive
disorder could benefit more from adding quetiapine, in comparison with aripiprazole,
to their current serotonergic medication.