Infrapolitics at the end of aesth-ethics: On Alberto Moreiras’ recent work

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
J. Matos
{"title":"Infrapolitics at the end of aesth-ethics: On Alberto Moreiras’ recent work","authors":"J. Matos","doi":"10.2298/fid2301098m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I will offer a reading of Alberto Moreiras? recently published books, but within the context of his life?s work as a whole: which I will consider from the point of view of a questioning of the idea of the time/ history difference. After briefly tracing that overarching concern in his early work, I move to a consideration of a move away from Hegelianism in the more recent publications. This non-Hegelianism is not simply an anti-Hegelian stance. Understanding the difference will take us into the true dimension of infrapolitics. This aspect of Moreiras? contribution to contemporary debates will be illustrated by way of his paradoxical and unrecognizable Antigone.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2301098m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper I will offer a reading of Alberto Moreiras? recently published books, but within the context of his life?s work as a whole: which I will consider from the point of view of a questioning of the idea of the time/ history difference. After briefly tracing that overarching concern in his early work, I move to a consideration of a move away from Hegelianism in the more recent publications. This non-Hegelianism is not simply an anti-Hegelian stance. Understanding the difference will take us into the true dimension of infrapolitics. This aspect of Moreiras? contribution to contemporary debates will be illustrated by way of his paradoxical and unrecognizable Antigone.
美学伦理学的终结——论阿尔贝托·莫雷拉斯的近作
在这篇论文中,我将解读阿尔贝托·莫雷拉斯?最近出版的书,但在他的生活背景下?作为一个整体,我将从质疑时间/历史差异的角度来考虑它。在简要地追溯了他早期作品中的首要关注点之后,我开始考虑在最近的出版物中远离黑格尔主义。这种非黑格尔主义并不是简单的反黑格尔立场。理解这种差异将带我们进入基础政治的真实维度。莫雷拉斯的这方面?对当代辩论的贡献将通过他的矛盾和不可识别的安提戈涅来说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信