[Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff].

Annika Saarto, Jos H Verbeek, Marie-Claude Lavoie, M. Pahwa
{"title":"[Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff].","authors":"Annika Saarto, Jos H Verbeek, Marie-Claude Lavoie, M. Pahwa","doi":"10.1002/14651858.cd009170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"assessed study eligibility and risk of bias in trials and extracted data. synthesized study results with a fixed-effect model meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":101300,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","volume":"8 1","pages":"142-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

assessed study eligibility and risk of bias in trials and extracted data. synthesized study results with a fixed-effect model meta-analysis.
[钝针与锋利缝合针预防手术人员经皮暴露事件的比较]。
评估试验的研究资格和偏倚风险,并提取数据。采用固定效应模型进行meta分析的综合研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信