Bruno de Finetti economista corporativo: dall’economia programmata alla costruzione della funzione di preferenza sociale

IF 0.2 Q4 LINGUISTICS

Studi e Saggi Linguistici Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.36253/978-88-5518-455-7.08

M. Pomini

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bruno de Finetti (1906-1985) is well known as the founder of the subjective theory of probability. Less known, with a few exceptions, is his contribution to economic theory during the early stage of his scientific career. In the second half of the 1930s, de Finetti was passionately involved in the field of welfare economics. To provide a theoretical framework for evaluating social welfare and to help in designing public policies, he developed a new mathematical tool: the theory of simultaneous maxima. Using this analytical approach, he also advanced the idea of a social welfare function, albeit quite different from the one introduced in 1938 by Abram Bergson, reflecting the debate on the economic planning among Italian economists.

查看原文本刊更多论文

布鲁诺·德菲内蒂企业经济学家:从计划经济到社会偏好函数的构建

布鲁诺·德·菲内蒂(1906-1985)是著名的主观性概率论的创始人。除了少数例外，鲜为人知的是他在科学生涯早期对经济理论的贡献。20世纪30年代后半期，菲内蒂热情地投身于福利经济学领域。为了提供一个评估社会福利和帮助设计公共政策的理论框架，他开发了一个新的数学工具:同时极大值理论。利用这种分析方法，他还提出了社会福利函数的概念，尽管与艾伯拉姆·柏格森(Abram Bergson)在1938年提出的概念有很大不同，反映了意大利经济学家对经济计划的争论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Studi e Saggi Linguistici LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： debate in Italy, especially for those scholars working in the field of Indo-European Historical Linguistics and contemporary Theoretical Linguistics. Today, after 50 years of life, Studi e Saggi Linguistici has a firm position in this field, but it also gained a larger international profile, including well-known foreign scholars as members of its Scientific Committee, and fostering the publication of English-written papers. The Editors always aim at publishing original and innovative papers, whose quality and exactness are guaranteed by the prestigious Scientific Committee, and by the anonymous peer-review process. Although a certain preference is accorded to both historical and general Linguistics, in line with the tradition, the Journal welcomes scientific contributions concerning any linguistic field, with no preference or prejudice for particular methodological approaches and theoretical paradigms.