Pulling It Together: A Mixed-Methods Study of Integrated Thinking Within a General Education Program

Q4 Social Sciences
Laura Cruz, J. Stone, Kyung Sun Chung, Bradley J. Sottile, Maggie Slattery
{"title":"Pulling It Together: A Mixed-Methods Study of Integrated Thinking Within a General Education Program","authors":"Laura Cruz, J. Stone, Kyung Sun Chung, Bradley J. Sottile, Maggie Slattery","doi":"10.5325/jgeneeduc.70.1-2.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:To enable students to navigate the \"wicked\" problems of the world, many universities have introduced integrative learning as a significant component of their general education programs. Despite recognition of the value of teaching students to make connections, apply, and synthesize information from multiple sources, relatively few studies exist that explore how students experience this form of thinking across the curriculum. The present study analyzes the open-ended responses to a student survey (n = 1,967) to gain insight into how students at a large, public research university perceive the integrative learning that takes place in their general education classes. Through the application of three methods of discourse analysis, our findings suggest that the majority of students were able to make connections across disciplines. By looking at the language they used to describe these connections, we were able to identify linkages between integrative learning, course attributes (such as size), and gender. Based on these linkages, we suggest potential new lines of inquiry and practice related to the development of a shared language for integrative learning and thinking.","PeriodicalId":39912,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of General Education","volume":"61 1","pages":"62 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of General Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/jgeneeduc.70.1-2.0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:To enable students to navigate the "wicked" problems of the world, many universities have introduced integrative learning as a significant component of their general education programs. Despite recognition of the value of teaching students to make connections, apply, and synthesize information from multiple sources, relatively few studies exist that explore how students experience this form of thinking across the curriculum. The present study analyzes the open-ended responses to a student survey (n = 1,967) to gain insight into how students at a large, public research university perceive the integrative learning that takes place in their general education classes. Through the application of three methods of discourse analysis, our findings suggest that the majority of students were able to make connections across disciplines. By looking at the language they used to describe these connections, we were able to identify linkages between integrative learning, course attributes (such as size), and gender. Based on these linkages, we suggest potential new lines of inquiry and practice related to the development of a shared language for integrative learning and thinking.
整合:通识教育项目中整合思维的混合方法研究
为了使学生能够驾驭世界上的“邪恶”问题,许多大学将综合学习作为其通识教育计划的重要组成部分。尽管人们认识到教育学生从多个来源建立联系、应用和综合信息的价值,但探索学生如何在整个课程中体验这种思维形式的研究相对较少。本研究分析了对一项学生调查(n = 1967)的开放式回答,以深入了解一所大型公立研究型大学的学生如何看待他们在通识教育课程中进行的整合学习。通过三种话语分析方法的应用,我们的研究结果表明,大多数学生能够建立跨学科的联系。通过观察他们用来描述这些联系的语言,我们能够确定综合学习、课程属性(如规模)和性别之间的联系。基于这些联系,我们提出了与开发一种用于综合学习和思考的共享语言相关的潜在的新探究和实践路线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of General Education
The Journal of General Education Social Sciences-Education
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信