A systematic review of the water treatment sludge toxicity to terrestrial and aquatic biota: state of the art and management challenges

A. C. Bernegossi, B. Freitas, G. B. Castro, J. P. Marques, L. F. Trindade, M. R. de Lima e Silva, M. C. Felipe, A. P. Ogura
{"title":"A systematic review of the water treatment sludge toxicity to terrestrial and aquatic biota: state of the art and management challenges","authors":"A. C. Bernegossi, B. Freitas, G. B. Castro, J. P. Marques, L. F. Trindade, M. R. de Lima e Silva, M. C. Felipe, A. P. Ogura","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2022.2060021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Safe drinking water’ supply is an essential service and depends directly on the water treatment that produces water treatment sludge (WTS) as a product, whose final destination varies and remains a challenge. The ecotoxicity assessment of the WTS address the ecological implications of the WTS disposal but these information is still scarce in the literature. In this sense, we did a systematic review of the ecotoxicological studies on WTS using databases from six platforms. From the 785 papers recovered; 16 studies were eligible and showed the ecotoxicity assays’ applicability to evaluate the WTS. We discussed WTS ecotoxicity considering sample characterization; terrestrial and aquatic toxicity assays; and WTS challenges. WTS proved to be a highly heterogeneous matrix composed mainly of coagulant precipitates, including Al and Fe. Studies lack consensus concerning the most representative/sensitive species for evaluating WTS’ toxicity. Crustaceans were the most studied aquatic group, although algae species were more sensitive. Besides, soil ecotoxicity assessed only plant growth, and a single study used the earthworm. Even papers used bioassays to indicate the recycling WTS’ feasibility, there is a lack of specific legislation regarding the WTS reuse. Furthermore, are necessary a regulation for WTS management that involves an ecological risk assessment.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"15 1 1","pages":"282 - 297"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2022.2060021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Safe drinking water’ supply is an essential service and depends directly on the water treatment that produces water treatment sludge (WTS) as a product, whose final destination varies and remains a challenge. The ecotoxicity assessment of the WTS address the ecological implications of the WTS disposal but these information is still scarce in the literature. In this sense, we did a systematic review of the ecotoxicological studies on WTS using databases from six platforms. From the 785 papers recovered; 16 studies were eligible and showed the ecotoxicity assays’ applicability to evaluate the WTS. We discussed WTS ecotoxicity considering sample characterization; terrestrial and aquatic toxicity assays; and WTS challenges. WTS proved to be a highly heterogeneous matrix composed mainly of coagulant precipitates, including Al and Fe. Studies lack consensus concerning the most representative/sensitive species for evaluating WTS’ toxicity. Crustaceans were the most studied aquatic group, although algae species were more sensitive. Besides, soil ecotoxicity assessed only plant growth, and a single study used the earthworm. Even papers used bioassays to indicate the recycling WTS’ feasibility, there is a lack of specific legislation regarding the WTS reuse. Furthermore, are necessary a regulation for WTS management that involves an ecological risk assessment.
水处理污泥对陆生和水生生物的毒性的系统综述:现状和管理挑战
安全饮用水的供应是一项必不可少的服务,它直接依赖于水处理,而水处理污泥作为一种产品产生,其最终归宿是不同的,仍然是一个挑战。WTS的生态毒性评估解决了WTS处置的生态影响,但这些信息在文献中仍然很少。在这个意义上,我们利用六个平台的数据库对WTS的生态毒理学研究进行了系统的回顾。从回收的785篇论文中;16项研究符合条件,显示了生态毒性试验评价WTS的适用性。考虑样品表征,我们讨论了WTS的生态毒性;陆地和水生毒性测定;和WTS挑战。WTS是一种高度不均匀的基体,主要由混凝沉淀组成,包括Al和Fe。对于评价WTS毒性的最具代表性/最敏感的物种,研究缺乏共识。甲壳类是研究最多的水生类群,尽管藻类物种更敏感。此外,土壤生态毒性仅评估植物生长,而且有一项研究使用了蚯蚓。即使有论文使用生物测定法来表明回收WTS的可行性,也缺乏关于WTS再利用的具体立法。此外,有必要制定一个涉及生态风险评估的WTS管理条例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信