Is Islamic banking stronger than conventional banking during the Covid-19 pandemic? Evidence from Indonesia

Dauh Wijana, I. W. Widnyana
{"title":"Is Islamic banking stronger than conventional banking during the Covid-19 pandemic? Evidence from Indonesia","authors":"Dauh Wijana, I. W. Widnyana","doi":"10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – We intended to test and compare the durability of Islamic banking and conventional banking during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. To that end, we first compared their performance before and during the pandemic. Next, we examined the effects of pandemic shocks on the performance of each of them.Methodology – The data covers 80 banks in Indonesia, which were divided into four groups, namely Islamic and conventional commercial banks, and Islamic and conventional rural banks. Each group consisted of 20 banks. Our observation period is 10 quarters, which was divided into two periods, namely the period before the pandemic (Q1-2019 – Q1-2020) and the period during the pandemic (Q2-2020 – Q2-2021). For comparison, we used a paired sample t-test, while testing the effect of shocks using a panel regression model.Findings – Islamic banking outperformed conventional banking, both before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Covid-19 pandemic has predominantly shaken conventional banking indicators and has only slightly shaken Islamic banking. However, this does not mean Islamic banks were superior to their conventional counterparts because both were shaken, it's just that conventional banks experienced a bigger shock than their Islamic counterparts.Originality – This is an original study that examines and compares the performance between Islamic and conventional banking using financial ratios during the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":34834,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose – We intended to test and compare the durability of Islamic banking and conventional banking during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. To that end, we first compared their performance before and during the pandemic. Next, we examined the effects of pandemic shocks on the performance of each of them.Methodology – The data covers 80 banks in Indonesia, which were divided into four groups, namely Islamic and conventional commercial banks, and Islamic and conventional rural banks. Each group consisted of 20 banks. Our observation period is 10 quarters, which was divided into two periods, namely the period before the pandemic (Q1-2019 – Q1-2020) and the period during the pandemic (Q2-2020 – Q2-2021). For comparison, we used a paired sample t-test, while testing the effect of shocks using a panel regression model.Findings – Islamic banking outperformed conventional banking, both before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Covid-19 pandemic has predominantly shaken conventional banking indicators and has only slightly shaken Islamic banking. However, this does not mean Islamic banks were superior to their conventional counterparts because both were shaken, it's just that conventional banks experienced a bigger shock than their Islamic counterparts.Originality – This is an original study that examines and compares the performance between Islamic and conventional banking using financial ratios during the Covid-19 pandemic.
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,伊斯兰银行业是否比传统银行业更强大?来自印度尼西亚的证据
目的:我们旨在测试和比较印度尼西亚2019冠状病毒病大流行期间伊斯兰银行和传统银行的持久性。为此,我们首先比较了它们在大流行之前和期间的表现。接下来,我们研究了流行病冲击对它们各自表现的影响。方法-数据涵盖印度尼西亚的80家银行,分为四组,即伊斯兰和传统商业银行,伊斯兰和传统农村银行。每组由20家银行组成。我们的观察期为10个季度,分为大流行前(2019年第一季度-2020年第一季度)和大流行期间(2020年第二季度-2021年第二季度)两个时期。为了进行比较,我们使用配对样本t检验,同时使用面板回归模型测试冲击的影响。研究结果显示:在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前和期间,伊斯兰银行的表现都优于传统银行。新冠肺炎疫情对传统银行业指标的影响主要是巨大的,对伊斯兰银行业的影响很小。然而,这并不意味着伊斯兰银行比传统银行优越,因为两者都受到了冲击,只是传统银行比伊斯兰银行遭受了更大的冲击。原创性:这是一项原创性研究,利用2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的财务比率检查和比较了伊斯兰银行和传统银行的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信