Cognitive control strategies in hearing impairment: a study with the AX–CPT

IF 0.3 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
M. Capizzi, A. Lovato, A. Visalli, C. de Filippis, A. Vallesi
{"title":"Cognitive control strategies in hearing impairment: a study with the AX–CPT","authors":"M. Capizzi, A. Lovato, A. Visalli, C. de Filippis, A. Vallesi","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2022.2041299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective The present study investigated the impact of hearing impairment on the implementation of proactive and reactive cognitive control strategies across the ageing process. Methods 31 hearing-impaired (HI) individuals with one cochlear implant and 41 normal-hearing (NH) listeners of different ages performed the AX–CPT, a well-validated task to measure proactive and reactive cognitive control strategies. Data from both accuracy and response times (RTs) were analysed by mixed effect models that considered trial type, group, age and their interactions. Results Both accuracy and RT analyses showed significant interactions between trial type, group and age. Specifically, with ageing, the NH group had lower performance on AY and BX trials (i.e. the most conflicting trial types of the AX–CPT associated with proactive and reactive control). Conversely, HI participants yielded higher performance on the same trial types at older ages. However, for the HI group only, the accuracy benefits observed for AY and BX trials were coupled with an age-related RT increase on both trial types (i.e. speed accuracy trade-off). Conclusion The present findings show a different utilisation of cognitive control strategies in HI participants as compared to NH listeners, at both younger and older ages.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2041299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective The present study investigated the impact of hearing impairment on the implementation of proactive and reactive cognitive control strategies across the ageing process. Methods 31 hearing-impaired (HI) individuals with one cochlear implant and 41 normal-hearing (NH) listeners of different ages performed the AX–CPT, a well-validated task to measure proactive and reactive cognitive control strategies. Data from both accuracy and response times (RTs) were analysed by mixed effect models that considered trial type, group, age and their interactions. Results Both accuracy and RT analyses showed significant interactions between trial type, group and age. Specifically, with ageing, the NH group had lower performance on AY and BX trials (i.e. the most conflicting trial types of the AX–CPT associated with proactive and reactive control). Conversely, HI participants yielded higher performance on the same trial types at older ages. However, for the HI group only, the accuracy benefits observed for AY and BX trials were coupled with an age-related RT increase on both trial types (i.e. speed accuracy trade-off). Conclusion The present findings show a different utilisation of cognitive control strategies in HI participants as compared to NH listeners, at both younger and older ages.
听力障碍的认知控制策略:AX-CPT的研究
摘要目的研究听力损伤对老年人主动和被动认知控制策略实施的影响。方法31名听力受损(HI)患者和41名不同年龄的听力正常(NH)听者进行了AX-CPT测试,这是一项经过验证的测试主动和反应性认知控制策略的任务。准确度和反应时间(RTs)的数据通过混合效应模型进行分析,该模型考虑了试验类型、组、年龄及其相互作用。结果准确性和RT分析均显示试验类型、组和年龄之间存在显著的交互作用。具体来说,随着年龄的增长,NH组在AY和BX试验中表现较差(即与主动和被动控制相关的AX-CPT最冲突的试验类型)。相反,HI参与者在年龄较大时,在相同的试验类型中表现更好。然而,仅对于HI组,在两种试验类型中,观察到的AY和BX试验的准确性益处与年龄相关的RT增加相结合(即速度准确性权衡)。结论:目前的研究结果表明,HI参与者在认知控制策略的使用上与NH听众不同,无论年龄大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信