{"title":"Critique","authors":"J. Onek","doi":"10.2307/3649165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout U.S. history, law enforcement agencies and other departments in federal, state and local governments have overreacted to perceived threats to American security in times of war or \"quasi-war\" and have violated civil liberties. At the very beginning of the Republic, when the new American nation was in danger of becoming embroiled in the wars between France and England, our Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Under those Acts, Congressmen and journalists were arrested, convicted and imprisoned simply for criticizing the government. In the Civil War, as is well known, President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus, and in many cases military tribunals were used inappropriately and illegally. In World War I, Congress once again passed many laws, ostensibly in support of the war effort, that violated basic human rights, such as freedom of speech and association. For example, Eugene Victor Debs, a socialist who had received millions of votes as a Presidential candidate, was convicted and imprisoned because he spoke out, with others, in opposition to the draft. After World War I, when there was significant concern about Bolshevism after the Russian Revolution, the government engaged in the so-called \"Palmer raids,\" a series of raids on, and arrests of, suspected radicals, many of whom were immigrants. Indeed, the A.C.L.U. was first founded to challenge those arrests. World War II saw one of the greatest stains on American democracy and certainly one of the greatest overreactions, the internment of Japanese Americans in response to claimed national security threats stemming from our war with Japan. U.S. citizens of Japanese origin were detained without any evidence that they were any danger to our security. In retrospect, this internment has been shown by competent scholars and military officials to have been absolutely unnecessary as well as a horrendous violation of civil liberties. Similarly, in the so-called \"Cold War\" we had periods of McCarthyism that included widespread blacklisting and other abuses at","PeriodicalId":44042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Religion","volume":"29 1","pages":"85 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3649165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Throughout U.S. history, law enforcement agencies and other departments in federal, state and local governments have overreacted to perceived threats to American security in times of war or "quasi-war" and have violated civil liberties. At the very beginning of the Republic, when the new American nation was in danger of becoming embroiled in the wars between France and England, our Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts. Under those Acts, Congressmen and journalists were arrested, convicted and imprisoned simply for criticizing the government. In the Civil War, as is well known, President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus, and in many cases military tribunals were used inappropriately and illegally. In World War I, Congress once again passed many laws, ostensibly in support of the war effort, that violated basic human rights, such as freedom of speech and association. For example, Eugene Victor Debs, a socialist who had received millions of votes as a Presidential candidate, was convicted and imprisoned because he spoke out, with others, in opposition to the draft. After World War I, when there was significant concern about Bolshevism after the Russian Revolution, the government engaged in the so-called "Palmer raids," a series of raids on, and arrests of, suspected radicals, many of whom were immigrants. Indeed, the A.C.L.U. was first founded to challenge those arrests. World War II saw one of the greatest stains on American democracy and certainly one of the greatest overreactions, the internment of Japanese Americans in response to claimed national security threats stemming from our war with Japan. U.S. citizens of Japanese origin were detained without any evidence that they were any danger to our security. In retrospect, this internment has been shown by competent scholars and military officials to have been absolutely unnecessary as well as a horrendous violation of civil liberties. Similarly, in the so-called "Cold War" we had periods of McCarthyism that included widespread blacklisting and other abuses at
纵观美国历史,联邦、州和地方政府的执法机构和其他部门在战争或“准战争”时期对美国安全面临的威胁反应过度,侵犯了公民自由。在共和国成立之初,当新生的美国有卷入英法战争的危险时,我们的国会通过了《外国人法》和《煽动叛乱法》。根据这些法案,国会议员和记者仅仅因为批评政府就被逮捕、定罪和监禁。众所周知,在南北战争中,林肯总统暂停了人身保护令,在许多情况下,军事法庭被不当和非法地使用。在第一次世界大战中,国会再次通过了许多表面上支持战争的法律,这些法律侵犯了言论自由和结社自由等基本人权。例如,尤金·维克多·德布斯(Eugene Victor Debs)是一位社会主义者,他作为总统候选人获得了数百万张选票,却因为与其他人一起公开反对征兵而被定罪并监禁。第一次世界大战后,俄国革命后,人们对布尔什维主义产生了极大的担忧,政府开展了所谓的“帕尔默突袭”,对涉嫌激进分子进行了一系列突袭和逮捕,其中许多人是移民。事实上,美国公民自由联盟成立之初就是为了挑战这些逮捕。第二次世界大战见证了美国民主最严重的污点之一,当然也是最严重的过度反应之一,即对日裔美国人的拘留,以回应我们与日本的战争所造成的国家安全威胁。日裔美国公民在没有任何证据表明他们对我们的安全构成任何威胁的情况下被拘留。回想起来,有能力的学者和军事官员已经证明,这种拘留是绝对不必要的,而且是对公民自由的可怕侵犯。同样,在所谓的“冷战”时期,我们经历了麦卡锡主义时期,包括广泛的黑名单和其他滥用权力的行为
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Law and Religion publishes cutting-edge research on religion, human rights, and religious freedom; religion-state relations; religious sources and dimensions of public, private, penal, and procedural law; religious legal systems and their place in secular law; theological jurisprudence; political theology; legal and religious ethics; and more. The Journal provides a distinguished forum for deep dialogue among Buddhist, Confucian, Christian, Hindu, Indigenous, Jewish, Muslim, and other faith traditions about fundamental questions of law, society, and politics.