Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures After Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Treatment with Implant Revision and Strut Allograft Augmentation

J. Sánchez-Sotelo, S. O’Driscoll, B. Morrey
{"title":"Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures After Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Treatment with Implant Revision and Strut Allograft Augmentation","authors":"J. Sánchez-Sotelo, S. O’Driscoll, B. Morrey","doi":"10.2106/00004623-200209000-00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Periprosthetic fractures are among the most challenging complications of elbow arthroplasty, and published information about the outcome of treatment is limited. The purpose of the present study was to determine the results of implant revision and strut allograft augmentation for the treatment of humeral periprosthetic fractures that occur around a loose humeral component.Methods: Between 1991 and 1999, eleven periprosthetic fractures that occurred around a loose humeral component were treated with cortical strut allograft augmentation and revision arthroplasty with use of a Coonrad-Morrey semiconstrained implant. Six fractures occurred after a primary arthroplasty, and five occurred after a revision arthroplasty. Two parallel strut grafts were used for fracture fixation in most cases. Patients were followed for an average of three years (range, nine months to 7.8 years) and were evaluated clinically and radiographically.Results: Clinical and radiographic fracture union was obtained in ten of the eleven patients. One patient required revision surgery because of aseptic loosening of the humeral component seven years and nine months after fracture union; there were no other implant failures. Complications included one additional nondisplaced humeral periprosthetic fracture after surgery that failed to heal with closed treatment, one olecranon fracture, one permanent ulnar nerve injury, and one case of triceps insufficiency. At the time of the most recent follow-up, seven of the eight patients with an intact reconstruction had a functional arc of motion and no or slight pain and one had limited motion and moderate pain.Conclusions: Periprosthetic humeral fractures that are associated with a loose humeral component can be effectively treated with revision elbow arthroplasty and strut allograft augmentation. The technique is associated with a high rate of fracture union, implant survival, and satisfactory clinical results. However, the complication rate is substantial.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"1642–1650"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"121","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200209000-00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 121

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic fractures are among the most challenging complications of elbow arthroplasty, and published information about the outcome of treatment is limited. The purpose of the present study was to determine the results of implant revision and strut allograft augmentation for the treatment of humeral periprosthetic fractures that occur around a loose humeral component.Methods: Between 1991 and 1999, eleven periprosthetic fractures that occurred around a loose humeral component were treated with cortical strut allograft augmentation and revision arthroplasty with use of a Coonrad-Morrey semiconstrained implant. Six fractures occurred after a primary arthroplasty, and five occurred after a revision arthroplasty. Two parallel strut grafts were used for fracture fixation in most cases. Patients were followed for an average of three years (range, nine months to 7.8 years) and were evaluated clinically and radiographically.Results: Clinical and radiographic fracture union was obtained in ten of the eleven patients. One patient required revision surgery because of aseptic loosening of the humeral component seven years and nine months after fracture union; there were no other implant failures. Complications included one additional nondisplaced humeral periprosthetic fracture after surgery that failed to heal with closed treatment, one olecranon fracture, one permanent ulnar nerve injury, and one case of triceps insufficiency. At the time of the most recent follow-up, seven of the eight patients with an intact reconstruction had a functional arc of motion and no or slight pain and one had limited motion and moderate pain.Conclusions: Periprosthetic humeral fractures that are associated with a loose humeral component can be effectively treated with revision elbow arthroplasty and strut allograft augmentation. The technique is associated with a high rate of fracture union, implant survival, and satisfactory clinical results. However, the complication rate is substantial.
全肘关节置换术后肱骨假体周围骨折:假体翻修和异体支架增强治疗
背景:假体周围骨折是肘关节置换术中最具挑战性的并发症之一,关于治疗结果的公开信息有限。本研究的目的是确定假体翻修和支撑异体移植物增强对肱骨假体周围骨折的治疗效果,这些骨折发生在肱骨松动部件周围。方法:1991年至1999年间,采用Coonrad-Morrey半应变植入物对11例肱骨松动周围发生的假体周围骨折进行皮质支撑异体移植物增强和翻修关节成形术治疗。6例骨折发生在初次关节置换术后,5例发生在翻修关节置换术后。多数病例均采用两根平行支架进行骨折固定。患者平均随访3年(9个月至7.8年),并进行临床和放射学评估。结果:11例患者中有10例骨折临床及影像学愈合。1例患者在骨折愈合后7年零9个月发生肱骨构件无菌性松动,需要进行翻修手术;没有其他的植入失败。并发症包括一例手术后未移位的肱骨假体周围骨折,经封闭治疗未能愈合,一例鹰嘴骨折,一例永久性尺神经损伤,一例三头肌功能不全。在最近的随访中,8例重建完整的患者中有7例具有功能活动弧度,无疼痛或轻微疼痛,1例运动受限,疼痛中度。结论:肱骨假体周围骨折伴肱骨松脱可通过改良肘关节置换术和异体支撑增强术有效治疗。该技术具有较高的骨折愈合率、植入物成活率和令人满意的临床结果。然而,并发症的发生率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信