016 Daily non-solar UV exposure

R. Sayre, J. Dowdy
{"title":"016 Daily non-solar UV exposure","authors":"R. Sayre, J. Dowdy","doi":"10.1034/J.1600-0781.2002.180208_16.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An examination of the UV emission by fluorescent and tungsten lamps often used for lighting in the home, office or school indicates a considerable amount of UV radiation load for unsuspecting individuals. The amount of UV exposure from non-solar sources would appear to be potentially as great as 1/2–2/3 MEDs daily or 150 MED yearly. This is interesting as it exceeds the generally often-quoted levels of expected UV accumulated from sunlight exposure during normal daily activities. \n \n \n \nOf possibly greater significance is the fact that this exposure contains wavelengths not present in sunlight reaching the earth's surface. Fluorescent lamps, activated by excited mercury wavelengths, emit significant amounts of short radiation < 290 nm, including clearly detectable 254 nm lines. Similarly, the common tungsten bulbs, even low 60 Watt bulbs, emit detectable UV radiation as short as 280 nm. Wavelengths this short do not represent a detectable risk from outdoor exposure. \n \n \n \nIt would appear plausible that concern about the increasing risk of melanoma due to UV in sunlight exposure may be misplaced. Individuals at greatest risk include doctors, nurses, school teachers, lawyers and office workers and not farmers, fishermen, or construction workers. The indoor office workers would receive vastly greater exposure from artificial lighting, especially at non-solar wavelengths, than would similar outdoor workers.","PeriodicalId":20104,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology, Photoimmunology and Photomedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology, Photoimmunology and Photomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1034/J.1600-0781.2002.180208_16.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

An examination of the UV emission by fluorescent and tungsten lamps often used for lighting in the home, office or school indicates a considerable amount of UV radiation load for unsuspecting individuals. The amount of UV exposure from non-solar sources would appear to be potentially as great as 1/2–2/3 MEDs daily or 150 MED yearly. This is interesting as it exceeds the generally often-quoted levels of expected UV accumulated from sunlight exposure during normal daily activities. Of possibly greater significance is the fact that this exposure contains wavelengths not present in sunlight reaching the earth's surface. Fluorescent lamps, activated by excited mercury wavelengths, emit significant amounts of short radiation < 290 nm, including clearly detectable 254 nm lines. Similarly, the common tungsten bulbs, even low 60 Watt bulbs, emit detectable UV radiation as short as 280 nm. Wavelengths this short do not represent a detectable risk from outdoor exposure. It would appear plausible that concern about the increasing risk of melanoma due to UV in sunlight exposure may be misplaced. Individuals at greatest risk include doctors, nurses, school teachers, lawyers and office workers and not farmers, fishermen, or construction workers. The indoor office workers would receive vastly greater exposure from artificial lighting, especially at non-solar wavelengths, than would similar outdoor workers.
016每日非太阳紫外线照射
对经常用于家庭、办公室或学校照明的荧光灯和钨丝灯的紫外线辐射进行的检查表明,毫无戒心的个人承受了相当大的紫外线辐射负荷。来自非太阳能来源的紫外线暴露量似乎可能高达每天1/2-2/3 MED或每年150 MED。这是很有趣的,因为它超过了通常通常引用的在正常日常活动中由阳光照射累积的预期紫外线水平。可能更重要的是,这种曝光包含了到达地球表面的阳光中不存在的波长。受激发汞波长激活的荧光灯发出大量< 290纳米的短辐射,包括可清楚检测到的254纳米线。同样,普通的钨丝灯泡,即使是低60瓦的灯泡,也能发出短至280纳米的紫外线辐射。这么短的波长并不代表暴露在户外会有可检测到的风险。人们担心阳光下的紫外线会增加患黑色素瘤的风险,这似乎是有道理的。风险最大的人群包括医生、护士、学校教师、律师和办公室工作人员,而不是农民、渔民或建筑工人。在室内工作的人会比在室外工作的人受到更多的人工照明,尤其是非太阳波长的照明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信