Thought, policies and politics: how may we imagine the public university in India?

Q4 Arts and Humanities
G. Arunima
{"title":"Thought, policies and politics: how may we imagine the public university in India?","authors":"G. Arunima","doi":"10.17159/2309-9585/2017/V43A11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The university is often imagined by many in the teaching profession as a crucible for critical thought, autonomy and democratic practices, even as the reality of our intellectual and professional existence in such spaces may belie such ideas. This is because the university is a paradoxical space – at once intimate and embattled – and because teaching is hierarchical, conducted in classrooms that are often deeply stratified and sometimes fraught spaces, where the mismatch between desire and actualisation is always present as an undercurrent. As Indian sociologist Shiv Visvanathan said rather provocatively in an early iteration of how one might envisage the university, ‘One must begin by stating that the university is an outrageous hypothesis, and its survival a miracle. Yet one also feels that if it did not exist, it would have to be invented.’1 In this paper, which has two different, though mutually constitutive parts, I wish to think about the sites from where we ask the question: ‘What is the university for?’ This mutual constitutiveness – that of the intersection of state policies on higher education with student politics – may seem somewhat counterintuitive yet is, I would argue, integral to understanding one of the most significant contemporary sites of crisis today: the steady erosion of the public university. This crisis is a matter of concern not merely for the global South, but is one that has generated heated academic and political debates all over the world.2 The first part of the paper, then, is an attempt to read an older imagination of the university against India’s draft National Policy on Education (NPE) 2016,3 announced by the Bharatiya Janata Party government last year, which threatens to undo the last vestiges of a state-supported, liberal education system and replace it with privatised skills building. This move is not unfamiliar, and aspects of this are visible in different parts of the world where a managerial imagination is helping to create educational systems that are geared towards generating ‘economic value’. While this is usually","PeriodicalId":53088,"journal":{"name":"Kronos","volume":"48 1","pages":"165-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kronos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-9585/2017/V43A11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The university is often imagined by many in the teaching profession as a crucible for critical thought, autonomy and democratic practices, even as the reality of our intellectual and professional existence in such spaces may belie such ideas. This is because the university is a paradoxical space – at once intimate and embattled – and because teaching is hierarchical, conducted in classrooms that are often deeply stratified and sometimes fraught spaces, where the mismatch between desire and actualisation is always present as an undercurrent. As Indian sociologist Shiv Visvanathan said rather provocatively in an early iteration of how one might envisage the university, ‘One must begin by stating that the university is an outrageous hypothesis, and its survival a miracle. Yet one also feels that if it did not exist, it would have to be invented.’1 In this paper, which has two different, though mutually constitutive parts, I wish to think about the sites from where we ask the question: ‘What is the university for?’ This mutual constitutiveness – that of the intersection of state policies on higher education with student politics – may seem somewhat counterintuitive yet is, I would argue, integral to understanding one of the most significant contemporary sites of crisis today: the steady erosion of the public university. This crisis is a matter of concern not merely for the global South, but is one that has generated heated academic and political debates all over the world.2 The first part of the paper, then, is an attempt to read an older imagination of the university against India’s draft National Policy on Education (NPE) 2016,3 announced by the Bharatiya Janata Party government last year, which threatens to undo the last vestiges of a state-supported, liberal education system and replace it with privatised skills building. This move is not unfamiliar, and aspects of this are visible in different parts of the world where a managerial imagination is helping to create educational systems that are geared towards generating ‘economic value’. While this is usually
思想、政策和政治:我们如何想象印度的公立大学?
大学常常被许多从事教学职业的人想象成批判性思维、自主和民主实践的熔炉,尽管我们在这样的空间里的智力和职业存在的现实可能与这些想法不符。这是因为大学是一个矛盾的空间——既亲密又陷入困境——因为教学是分层的,在课堂上进行的教学往往是分层很深的,有时是令人担忧的空间,在那里,欲望和现实之间的不匹配总是作为一种暗流存在。正如印度社会学家希夫·维斯瓦纳坦(Shiv Visvanathan)在早期关于人们如何设想大学的论述中颇具挑衅性地说的那样,“人们必须首先说明,大学是一个离谱的假设,它的存在是一个奇迹。”然而,人们也会觉得,即使它不存在,它也必须被发明出来。这篇论文有两个不同的部分,虽然相互构成,但我希望思考我们提出这个问题的地点:“大学是为了什么?”这种相互构成性——即国家高等教育政策与学生政治的交集——可能看起来有点违反直觉,但我认为,这是理解当今最重要的当代危机之一所不可或缺的:公立大学的不断侵蚀。这场危机不仅是全球发展中国家所关注的问题,而且在全世界范围内引发了激烈的学术和政治辩论因此,本文的第一部分试图解读一种对大学的旧想象,以反对印度人民党政府去年宣布的2016年国家教育政策草案(NPE) 3,该草案威胁要消除国家支持的自由教育体系的最后残余,代之以私有化的技能培养。这一举动并不陌生,在世界不同地区,管理想象力正在帮助创建旨在创造“经济价值”的教育系统,这一趋势的各个方面都很明显。虽然这通常是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kronos
Kronos Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信