A Semi-Analytical Geomechanical Approach for Forecasting Production Performance in Multifractured Composite Systems

A. B. Lamidi, C. Clarkson
{"title":"A Semi-Analytical Geomechanical Approach for Forecasting Production Performance in Multifractured Composite Systems","authors":"A. B. Lamidi, C. Clarkson","doi":"10.2118/208154-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stress-dependence of reservoir matrix and fractures can strongly affect the performance of multifractured horizontal wells (MFHWs) completed in unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs. In order to model fluid flow in unconventional reservoirs exhibiting this stress-dependence, most traditional reservoir flow simulators, and many simulators described in published work, use conventional reservoir fluid flow model formulations. These formulations typically neglect the influence of the rate of change of volumetric strain of the reservoir matrix and fractures, even though reservoir stress and pressure change significantly during the course of production. As a result, the effect of matrix and fracture deformation on production is neglected, which can lead to errors in predicting production performance in most stress-sensitive reservoirs. To address this problem, some studies have proposed the use of porosity and transmissibility multipliers to model stress-sensitive reservoirs. However, in order to apply this approach, multipliers must be estimated from laboratory experiments, or used as a history-match parameter, possibly resulting in large errors in well performance predictions. Alternatively, fully-coupled, fully numerical geomechanical simulation can be performed, but these methods are computationally costly, and models are difficult to setup.\n This paper presents a new fully-coupled, two-way analytical modeling approach that can be used to simulate fluid flow in stress-sensitive unconventional reservoirs produced through MFHWs. The model couples poroelastic geomechanics theory with fluid flow formulations. The two-way coupled fluid flow-geomechanical analytical model is applied simultaneously to both the matrix and fracture regions. In the proposed algorithm, a porosity-compressibility coupling parameter for the two physical models is setup to update the stress- and pressure-dependent fracture/matrix properties iteratively, which are later used as input data for the fracture-matrix reservoir fluid flow model at each iteration step.\n The analytical approach developed for the fully-coupled, two-way analytical model, using the enhanced fracture region conceptual model, is validated by comparing the results with numerical simulation. Predictions using the fully-coupled enhanced fracture region model are then compared with the same enhanced fracture region model but with the conventional pressure-dependent modeling approach implemented. A sensitivity study performed by comparing the new fully-coupled model predictions with and without geomechanics effects accounted for reveals that, without geomechanics effects, production performance in stress-sensitive reservoirs might be overestimated. The study also demonstrates that use of the conventional stress-dependent modeling approach may cause production performance to be underestimated. Therefore, the proposed fully-coupled, two-way analytical model can be useful for practical engineering purposes.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208154-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress-dependence of reservoir matrix and fractures can strongly affect the performance of multifractured horizontal wells (MFHWs) completed in unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs. In order to model fluid flow in unconventional reservoirs exhibiting this stress-dependence, most traditional reservoir flow simulators, and many simulators described in published work, use conventional reservoir fluid flow model formulations. These formulations typically neglect the influence of the rate of change of volumetric strain of the reservoir matrix and fractures, even though reservoir stress and pressure change significantly during the course of production. As a result, the effect of matrix and fracture deformation on production is neglected, which can lead to errors in predicting production performance in most stress-sensitive reservoirs. To address this problem, some studies have proposed the use of porosity and transmissibility multipliers to model stress-sensitive reservoirs. However, in order to apply this approach, multipliers must be estimated from laboratory experiments, or used as a history-match parameter, possibly resulting in large errors in well performance predictions. Alternatively, fully-coupled, fully numerical geomechanical simulation can be performed, but these methods are computationally costly, and models are difficult to setup. This paper presents a new fully-coupled, two-way analytical modeling approach that can be used to simulate fluid flow in stress-sensitive unconventional reservoirs produced through MFHWs. The model couples poroelastic geomechanics theory with fluid flow formulations. The two-way coupled fluid flow-geomechanical analytical model is applied simultaneously to both the matrix and fracture regions. In the proposed algorithm, a porosity-compressibility coupling parameter for the two physical models is setup to update the stress- and pressure-dependent fracture/matrix properties iteratively, which are later used as input data for the fracture-matrix reservoir fluid flow model at each iteration step. The analytical approach developed for the fully-coupled, two-way analytical model, using the enhanced fracture region conceptual model, is validated by comparing the results with numerical simulation. Predictions using the fully-coupled enhanced fracture region model are then compared with the same enhanced fracture region model but with the conventional pressure-dependent modeling approach implemented. A sensitivity study performed by comparing the new fully-coupled model predictions with and without geomechanics effects accounted for reveals that, without geomechanics effects, production performance in stress-sensitive reservoirs might be overestimated. The study also demonstrates that use of the conventional stress-dependent modeling approach may cause production performance to be underestimated. Therefore, the proposed fully-coupled, two-way analytical model can be useful for practical engineering purposes.
多裂缝复合体系生产动态预测的半解析地质力学方法
储层基质和裂缝的应力依赖性会严重影响非常规油气藏多缝水平井的完井性能。为了模拟具有这种应力依赖性的非常规油藏中的流体流动,大多数传统的油藏流动模拟器以及许多已发表的模拟器都使用传统的油藏流体流动模型公式。这些公式通常忽略了储层基质和裂缝体积应变变化率的影响,即使在生产过程中储层应力和压力发生了显著变化。因此,忽略了基质和裂缝变形对产量的影响,这可能导致大多数应力敏感油藏在预测生产动态时出现误差。为了解决这一问题,一些研究提出使用孔隙度和渗透率乘数来模拟应力敏感油藏。然而,为了应用这种方法,必须从实验室实验中估计乘数,或者将乘数用作历史匹配参数,这可能会导致井况预测出现较大误差。另外,也可以进行全耦合、全数值地质力学模拟,但这些方法计算成本高,而且模型难以建立。本文提出了一种新的全耦合、双向分析建模方法,可用于模拟通过MFHWs开采的应力敏感非常规油藏的流体流动。该模型将孔隙弹性地质力学理论与流体流动公式相结合。将流体流动-地质力学双向耦合分析模型同时应用于基质和裂缝区域。在该算法中,为两个物理模型设置孔隙率-压缩性耦合参数,迭代更新应力和压力相关的裂缝/基质性质,然后在每个迭代步骤中将其作为裂缝-基质油藏流体流动模型的输入数据。通过与数值模拟结果的对比,验证了采用增强裂缝区域概念模型建立的全耦合双向解析模型的解析方法。然后,将使用全耦合增强裂缝区域模型的预测结果与使用常规压力相关建模方法的相同增强裂缝区域模型进行比较。通过比较考虑和不考虑地质力学影响的新全耦合模型预测结果的敏感性研究表明,如果不考虑地质力学影响,应力敏感油藏的生产动态可能会被高估。研究还表明,使用传统的应力相关建模方法可能会导致生产动态被低估。因此,所提出的全耦合、双向分析模型可用于实际工程目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信