Ethical issues in regenerative approaches in neonatology

Villalon-Urrutia Hernan, Rosenberg-Pacareu Javiera
{"title":"Ethical issues in regenerative approaches in neonatology","authors":"Villalon-Urrutia Hernan, Rosenberg-Pacareu Javiera","doi":"10.15406/JACCOA.2018.10.00360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com tissue-specific cells or somatic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) since they do not pose, in principle, more ethical conflicts than those related to the informed consent of the person from whom the cells are extracted. This contrasts with the observed in the so-called therapeutic cloning where there is a later manipulation of embryonic stem cells. These cells have the ability to generate any differentiated cell in the body (pluripotent), those who oppose have argued that it is an illicit intervention. The main argument against the use of this type of cells is that theoretically, fertilization may have been performed for the sole purpose of achieving an embryo from which to obtain this material. Subsequent cytological management is also under discussion. The development of culture embryonic cell in vitro aims to overcome this ethical dilemma.4","PeriodicalId":14916,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","volume":"123 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia & Critical Care: Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/JACCOA.2018.10.00360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com tissue-specific cells or somatic mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) since they do not pose, in principle, more ethical conflicts than those related to the informed consent of the person from whom the cells are extracted. This contrasts with the observed in the so-called therapeutic cloning where there is a later manipulation of embryonic stem cells. These cells have the ability to generate any differentiated cell in the body (pluripotent), those who oppose have argued that it is an illicit intervention. The main argument against the use of this type of cells is that theoretically, fertilization may have been performed for the sole purpose of achieving an embryo from which to obtain this material. Subsequent cytological management is also under discussion. The development of culture embryonic cell in vitro aims to overcome this ethical dilemma.4
新生儿科再生方法中的伦理问题
提交稿件| http://medcraveonline.com组织特异性细胞或体细胞间充质干细胞(MSC),因为它们原则上不会比那些与细胞提取者知情同意相关的伦理冲突更多。这与在所谓的治疗性克隆中观察到的情况形成对比,后者是对胚胎干细胞的后期操作。这些细胞有能力在体内产生任何分化细胞(多能性),反对者认为这是一种非法干预。反对使用这类细胞的主要论点是,从理论上讲,受精的唯一目的可能是获得胚胎,从中获得这种物质。后续的细胞学处理也在讨论中。体外培养胚胎细胞的发展旨在克服这一伦理困境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书