Emergency Remote Teaching Student Responses to Intensive versus Extensive Course Modalities during the Pandemic

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Ennis, Dietmar Unterkofler, Elena Bonetto
{"title":"Emergency Remote Teaching Student Responses to Intensive versus Extensive Course Modalities during the Pandemic","authors":"M. Ennis, Dietmar Unterkofler, Elena Bonetto","doi":"10.7358/lcm-2023-001-enni","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 forced university language programs to reevaluate and revolutionize their teaching practices. While in the years preceding the pandemic, many administrators and practitioners were reluctant to embrace blended or fully online language courses, these teaching/learning modalities quickly became the “new normal”. To monitor the efficacy of the courses offered remotely during the 2020/21 academic year, the Language Center of Libera Università di Bolzano administered a series of surveys to students – in addition to the data we routinely collect by way of our “big data” approach to language curriculum monitoring. These courses were offered both in an “extensive” and an “intensive” format. The responses to the surveys – in combination with course enrollment, participation, and completion data – offer an opportunity to investigate students’ attitudes and behavior toward remote teaching and learning, but also to compare intensive language teaching and learning with extensive language teaching and learning, a topic which has not received sufficient attention in the literature to-date. Notwithstanding the well-documented challenges associated with “emergency remote teaching”, we observed many positive experiences and outcomes. Our data is being used to inform decisions regarding which courses will continue to be taught fully or partially online in the years to come.","PeriodicalId":37089,"journal":{"name":"Languages Cultures Mediation","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages Cultures Mediation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7358/lcm-2023-001-enni","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Covid-19 forced university language programs to reevaluate and revolutionize their teaching practices. While in the years preceding the pandemic, many administrators and practitioners were reluctant to embrace blended or fully online language courses, these teaching/learning modalities quickly became the “new normal”. To monitor the efficacy of the courses offered remotely during the 2020/21 academic year, the Language Center of Libera Università di Bolzano administered a series of surveys to students – in addition to the data we routinely collect by way of our “big data” approach to language curriculum monitoring. These courses were offered both in an “extensive” and an “intensive” format. The responses to the surveys – in combination with course enrollment, participation, and completion data – offer an opportunity to investigate students’ attitudes and behavior toward remote teaching and learning, but also to compare intensive language teaching and learning with extensive language teaching and learning, a topic which has not received sufficient attention in the literature to-date. Notwithstanding the well-documented challenges associated with “emergency remote teaching”, we observed many positive experiences and outcomes. Our data is being used to inform decisions regarding which courses will continue to be taught fully or partially online in the years to come.
大流行期间紧急远程教学学生对强化与广泛课程模式的反应
新冠疫情迫使大学语言课程重新评估和改革他们的教学实践。虽然在大流行之前的几年里,许多管理人员和从业人员不愿接受混合或完全在线的语言课程,但这些教学/学习模式很快成为“新常态”。为了监测2020/21学年远程提供的课程的效果,博尔扎诺自由大学语言中心对学生进行了一系列调查——除了我们通过“大数据”方法常规收集的数据来监测语言课程。这些课程以“广泛”和“集中”两种形式提供。对调查的回应-结合课程注册,参与和完成数据-提供了一个调查学生对远程教学和学习的态度和行为的机会,而且还比较了强化语言教学和学习与广泛的语言教学和学习,这是一个迄今为止在文献中没有得到足够重视的主题。尽管与"紧急远程教学"相关的挑战有据可查,但我们观察到许多积极的经验和成果。我们的数据被用来决定哪些课程将在未来几年继续全部或部分在线教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Languages Cultures Mediation
Languages Cultures Mediation Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信