Effects of Sensory Diets: A Single Subject Study

Vidya Pingale, T. Fletcher, Catherine Candler, N. Pickens, Karen Dunlap
{"title":"Effects of Sensory Diets: A Single Subject Study","authors":"Vidya Pingale, T. Fletcher, Catherine Candler, N. Pickens, Karen Dunlap","doi":"10.1080/19411243.2021.1941492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT To compare the effect of sensory diets on children’s sensory processing, psychosocial skills, and classroom engagement to a control intervention of non-therapeutic fine-motor or visual activities. A single-subject ABCA experimental design was used with five children attending prekindergarten through fourth-grade special education in an urban public school. Investigators measured target behaviors individualized for each participant in sensory processing skills, psychosocial skills, and classroom engagement. Data were analyzed visually and statistically. Sensory diets may have changed participants’ sensory processing, psychosocial skills, and classroom engagement behaviors. However, target behaviors for each participant responded to sensory diets differently. Control intervention of non-therapeutic fine-motor visual activities did not change these behaviors. Positive and individualized changes in sensory processing, psychosocial, and classroom engagement behaviors were noted for each of the five children when sensory diets were administered in brief sessions throughout a school day. Changes did not occur in response to control intervention sessions indicating the sensory aspects of the intervention may have had influence. Future study is needed to demonstrate a causal relationship between sensory diets and classroom behaviors.","PeriodicalId":92676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","volume":"13 1","pages":"165 - 180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational therapy, schools & early intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19411243.2021.1941492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT To compare the effect of sensory diets on children’s sensory processing, psychosocial skills, and classroom engagement to a control intervention of non-therapeutic fine-motor or visual activities. A single-subject ABCA experimental design was used with five children attending prekindergarten through fourth-grade special education in an urban public school. Investigators measured target behaviors individualized for each participant in sensory processing skills, psychosocial skills, and classroom engagement. Data were analyzed visually and statistically. Sensory diets may have changed participants’ sensory processing, psychosocial skills, and classroom engagement behaviors. However, target behaviors for each participant responded to sensory diets differently. Control intervention of non-therapeutic fine-motor visual activities did not change these behaviors. Positive and individualized changes in sensory processing, psychosocial, and classroom engagement behaviors were noted for each of the five children when sensory diets were administered in brief sessions throughout a school day. Changes did not occur in response to control intervention sessions indicating the sensory aspects of the intervention may have had influence. Future study is needed to demonstrate a causal relationship between sensory diets and classroom behaviors.
感官饮食的影响:一项单受试者研究
比较感官饮食对儿童感觉加工、社会心理技能和课堂参与的影响与非治疗性精细运动或视觉活动的控制干预。采用单受试者ABCA实验设计,选取一所城市公立学校从学前班到四年级特殊教育的5名儿童。调查人员测量了每个参与者在感觉处理技能、社会心理技能和课堂参与度方面的个性化目标行为。对数据进行视觉和统计分析。感官饮食可能改变了参与者的感官处理、社会心理技能和课堂参与行为。然而,每个参与者的目标行为对感官饮食的反应是不同的。非治疗性精细运动视觉活动的对照干预没有改变这些行为。当在学校一天的短暂时间内给予感官饮食时,五个孩子的感官处理、社会心理和课堂参与行为都发生了积极和个性化的变化。对照干预课程没有发生变化,表明干预的感官方面可能产生了影响。未来的研究需要证明感官饮食和课堂行为之间的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信