Diasporas and Global Musical Networks: Jewish Perspectives

Q3 Arts and Humanities
E. Seroussi
{"title":"Diasporas and Global Musical Networks: Jewish Perspectives","authors":"E. Seroussi","doi":"10.30819/aemr.9-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The COVID-19 pandemic, still present in our lives as I carve these lines, dictates not only daily routines but also scholarly concerns. Thus, global musical networks, the subject of this essay, should be a pertinent concern for musicologists today more than ever before. If we needed a tangible proof of human interdependence at a global level, then this boundless health crisis showed the full extent to which human civilization is hyper-connected. However, one should not turn the idea of connectivity into an exclusively modern phenomenon. Humans interacted with each other from the dawn of evolution. What changed in our times is simply the intensity of such interdependence generated by new transportation and information flow technologies.\nMusic is not immune to such transformative processes. Therefore, human connectivity is also an essential ingredient of a global vision of history and of music history in particular. Music studies are relatively latecomers to the idea of global history as a conceptual framework of research but not in practice, as I shall comment on a moment. The establishment of a Study Group at ICTM dedicated to a global history of music is a response to a new paradigm in the ‘economy of historical knowledge’, namely, how we speak and write about music history.1 Yet, many members of ICTM have been addressing music history from global perspectives ever since its establishment in 1947 without profiling what they did by this name. Therefore, before addressing the concept at the center of this paper, diaspora and its pertinence to global music history, some brief remarks on global history in general are called for. \n\n","PeriodicalId":36147,"journal":{"name":"Asian-European Music Research Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian-European Music Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30819/aemr.9-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic, still present in our lives as I carve these lines, dictates not only daily routines but also scholarly concerns. Thus, global musical networks, the subject of this essay, should be a pertinent concern for musicologists today more than ever before. If we needed a tangible proof of human interdependence at a global level, then this boundless health crisis showed the full extent to which human civilization is hyper-connected. However, one should not turn the idea of connectivity into an exclusively modern phenomenon. Humans interacted with each other from the dawn of evolution. What changed in our times is simply the intensity of such interdependence generated by new transportation and information flow technologies. Music is not immune to such transformative processes. Therefore, human connectivity is also an essential ingredient of a global vision of history and of music history in particular. Music studies are relatively latecomers to the idea of global history as a conceptual framework of research but not in practice, as I shall comment on a moment. The establishment of a Study Group at ICTM dedicated to a global history of music is a response to a new paradigm in the ‘economy of historical knowledge’, namely, how we speak and write about music history.1 Yet, many members of ICTM have been addressing music history from global perspectives ever since its establishment in 1947 without profiling what they did by this name. Therefore, before addressing the concept at the center of this paper, diaspora and its pertinence to global music history, some brief remarks on global history in general are called for.
散居与全球音乐网络:犹太人的观点
在我写下这些文字时,COVID-19大流行仍然存在于我们的生活中,不仅影响了我们的日常生活,也影响了我们的学术关注。因此,全球音乐网络,这篇文章的主题,应该是一个相关的关注音乐学家今天比以往任何时候。如果我们需要一个人类在全球层面相互依存的切实证据,那么这场无边无际的健康危机充分显示了人类文明的高度联系。然而,我们不应该把连通性的概念变成一种专属于现代的现象。人类从进化之初就开始相互交流。在我们这个时代发生的变化仅仅是由新的运输和信息流技术所产生的这种相互依赖的强度。音乐也不能幸免于这样的变革过程。因此,人类的联系也是全球历史观的一个重要组成部分,尤其是音乐史。音乐研究相对较晚才将全球历史作为一种研究的概念框架,但在实践中却没有,我稍后会对此进行评论。在ICTM建立一个致力于全球音乐史的研究小组是对“历史知识经济”新范式的回应,即我们如何谈论和撰写音乐史然而,自1947年成立以来,ICTM的许多成员一直从全球的角度来讨论音乐史,而没有描述他们以这个名字所做的事情。因此,在讨论本文的中心概念,散居及其与全球音乐史的相关性之前,需要对全球历史进行一些简要的评述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian-European Music Research Journal
Asian-European Music Research Journal Arts and Humanities-Museology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信