Escaping Meaning, Escaping Music

4区 社会学 Q2 Arts and Humanities
Claire Colebrook
{"title":"Escaping Meaning, Escaping Music","authors":"Claire Colebrook","doi":"10.14321/CRNEWCENTREVI.18.2.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"expressionist or not (I’m thinking of certain pieces from the Cobra group). (Lyotard 1992, 141) Even more directly, Deleuze and Guattari’s theorization of the “minor” has its foundation in music and is a deviation from Romanticism. The minor is neither lesser, nor outside, but a deflection from within the major that can be released from its nineteenth-century and human modes to become (as with Lyotard) a form of synthesis that is not that of a subject: It is true that the minor “mode” gives tonal music a decentered, runaway, fugitive character due to the nature of its intervals and the lesser stability of its chords. This mode thus has the ambiguity of undergoing operations that align it to a major model or standard at the same time as it continues to display a certain modal power (puissance) irreducible to tonality, as though music set out on a journey and garnered all resurgences, phantoms of the Orient, imaginary lands, traditions from all over. But temperament, tempered chromaticism has an even greater ambiguity: stretching the action of the center to the most distant tones, but also preparing the disaggregation of the central principle, replacing the centered forms of continuous development with a form that constantly dissolves and transforms itself. When development subordinates form and spans the whole, as in Beethoven, variation begins to free itself and becomes identified with creation. But when chromaticism is unleashed, becomes a generalized chromaticism, turns back against temperament, affecting not only pitches but all sound components—durations, intensities, timbre, attacks—it becomes impossible to speak of a sound form organizing matter; it is no longer even possible to speak of a continuous development of form. Rather, it is a question of a highly complex and elaborate material making audible nonsonorous forces. The couple matter-form is replaced by the coupling material-forces. The synthesizer has taken the place of the old “a priori synthetic judgment,” and all functions change accordingly. By placing C l a i r e C o l e b r o o k 1 1","PeriodicalId":45935,"journal":{"name":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","volume":"2 1","pages":"34 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/CRNEWCENTREVI.18.2.0009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

expressionist or not (I’m thinking of certain pieces from the Cobra group). (Lyotard 1992, 141) Even more directly, Deleuze and Guattari’s theorization of the “minor” has its foundation in music and is a deviation from Romanticism. The minor is neither lesser, nor outside, but a deflection from within the major that can be released from its nineteenth-century and human modes to become (as with Lyotard) a form of synthesis that is not that of a subject: It is true that the minor “mode” gives tonal music a decentered, runaway, fugitive character due to the nature of its intervals and the lesser stability of its chords. This mode thus has the ambiguity of undergoing operations that align it to a major model or standard at the same time as it continues to display a certain modal power (puissance) irreducible to tonality, as though music set out on a journey and garnered all resurgences, phantoms of the Orient, imaginary lands, traditions from all over. But temperament, tempered chromaticism has an even greater ambiguity: stretching the action of the center to the most distant tones, but also preparing the disaggregation of the central principle, replacing the centered forms of continuous development with a form that constantly dissolves and transforms itself. When development subordinates form and spans the whole, as in Beethoven, variation begins to free itself and becomes identified with creation. But when chromaticism is unleashed, becomes a generalized chromaticism, turns back against temperament, affecting not only pitches but all sound components—durations, intensities, timbre, attacks—it becomes impossible to speak of a sound form organizing matter; it is no longer even possible to speak of a continuous development of form. Rather, it is a question of a highly complex and elaborate material making audible nonsonorous forces. The couple matter-form is replaced by the coupling material-forces. The synthesizer has taken the place of the old “a priori synthetic judgment,” and all functions change accordingly. By placing C l a i r e C o l e b r o o k 1 1
逃避意义,逃避音乐
不管是不是表现主义(我想的是眼镜蛇组的某些作品)。(Lyotard 1991,141)更直接的是,德勒兹和瓜塔里对“小调”的理论化有其音乐基础,是对浪漫主义的背离。小调既不是较小的,也不是外部的,而是从大调内部的偏转,它可以从十九世纪和人类的调式中释放出来,成为(像利奥塔一样)一种合成的形式,而不是主调的形式:小调“调式”确实赋予调性音乐一种偏心的、逃跑的、逃亡的特征,这是由于它的音程的性质和它的和弦的不太稳定。因此,这种模式具有一种模糊性,即经历着将其与主要模式或标准对齐的操作,同时它继续显示出某种不可简化为调性的模态力量(力量),就好像音乐开始了一段旅程,收集了所有的复兴,东方的幽灵,想象的土地,来自世界各地的传统。但气质、调质半音则具有更大的模糊性:将中心的作用延伸到最遥远的音调,但也准备消解中心原则,用不断溶解和自我转化的形式取代持续发展的中心形式。当发展从属于形式并跨越整体时,就像贝多芬那样,变奏开始解放自己,并与创造等同起来。但是,当半音制被释放出来,成为一种普遍化的半音制,转而反对音律,不仅影响音高,而且影响所有的声音成分——持续时间、强度、音色、攻击——这就不可能说成是一种音型组织物质;甚至再也不可能说形式的连续发展了。更确切地说,这是一个高度复杂和精心制作的材料产生可听的非声音力量的问题。耦合的物质形态被耦合的物质力所取代。合成器取代了旧的“先验的综合判断”,所有的功能都随之改变。通过把C 1放到C 1中,C 1就会变成C 1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW
CR-THE NEW CENTENNIAL REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The New Centennial Review is devoted to comparative studies of the Americas that suggest possibilities for a different future. Centennial Review is published three times a year under the editorship of Scott Michaelsen (Department of English, Michigan State University) and David E. Johnson (Department of Comparative Literature, SUNY at Buffalo). The journal recognizes that the language of the Americas is translation, and that questions of translation, dialogue, and border crossings (linguistic, cultural, national, and the like) are necessary for rethinking the foundations and limits of the Americas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信