Risk management in public sector construction projects: Case studies in Lesotho

IF 0.6 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Molefi Nketekete, F. Emuze, J. Smallwood
{"title":"Risk management in public sector construction projects: Case studies in Lesotho","authors":"Molefi Nketekete, F. Emuze, J. Smallwood","doi":"10.18820/24150487/AS23I2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Construction projects are facing problems that impede their expected performance. Time, cost, quality, and competition limitations place constraints on projects. These challenges require incisive risk-management (RM) practices. This article presents the findings of a multiple case study, which determined how and why public sector construction projects are failing in terms of contemporary RM practices that appear to be lacking in Lesotho construction. The article investigates the stakeholders’ perceptions regarding risks’ likelihoods and impacts (P-Is) on three public sector construction projects. A 5-point Likert measurement scale was used to collect data for the P-I grids. The data are analysed and presented with Scatter plots. The results obtained through cross-case synthesis show that the interviewees perceive the level of risks’ P-Is on the examined construction projects to be high. Moreover, the level of RM practice is found to be inconsistent with best practices. To enhance RM practices in Lesotho, the management of public sector construction projects should promote the use of competent project managers. Keywords: Construction, Lesotho, public sector, risk management","PeriodicalId":42571,"journal":{"name":"Acta Structilia","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Structilia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150487/AS23I2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Construction projects are facing problems that impede their expected performance. Time, cost, quality, and competition limitations place constraints on projects. These challenges require incisive risk-management (RM) practices. This article presents the findings of a multiple case study, which determined how and why public sector construction projects are failing in terms of contemporary RM practices that appear to be lacking in Lesotho construction. The article investigates the stakeholders’ perceptions regarding risks’ likelihoods and impacts (P-Is) on three public sector construction projects. A 5-point Likert measurement scale was used to collect data for the P-I grids. The data are analysed and presented with Scatter plots. The results obtained through cross-case synthesis show that the interviewees perceive the level of risks’ P-Is on the examined construction projects to be high. Moreover, the level of RM practice is found to be inconsistent with best practices. To enhance RM practices in Lesotho, the management of public sector construction projects should promote the use of competent project managers. Keywords: Construction, Lesotho, public sector, risk management
公共部门建筑项目的风险管理:莱索托案例研究
建设项目面临着阻碍其预期绩效的问题。时间、成本、质量和竞争限制对项目构成了限制。这些挑战需要敏锐的风险管理(RM)实践。本文介绍了一个多案例研究的结果,该研究确定了公共部门建设项目如何以及为什么在莱索托建设中缺乏当代RM实践方面失败。本文调查了利益相关者对三个公共部门建设项目的风险可能性和影响(P-Is)的看法。采用5点李克特量表收集P-I网格的数据。对数据进行了分析,并用散点图表示。通过交叉案例综合得出的结果表明,受访者认为所考察的建设项目的风险P-Is水平较高。此外,RM实践水平被发现与最佳实践不一致。为了加强莱索托的管理实践,公共部门建设项目的管理应促进使用有能力的项目经理。关键词:建筑业,莱索托,公共部门,风险管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Structilia
Acta Structilia MANAGEMENT-
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信